Difference between revisions of "User talk:Radh"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Could you do [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Indian_Movement&curid=40120&diff=763727&oldid=331656&rcid=838624 this edit] again, and find a way to keep the accusation? While you were correct to take out the "never brought to justice" part, because that implies that the accusation is true, it might be useful to our readers to know '''who''' accused the agent of murder. We don't need to take sides in controversies all the time; often it's better to present both sides and let the reader decide, as in the original Wikipedia NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:25, 20 March 2010 (EDT) | Could you do [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=American_Indian_Movement&curid=40120&diff=763727&oldid=331656&rcid=838624 this edit] again, and find a way to keep the accusation? While you were correct to take out the "never brought to justice" part, because that implies that the accusation is true, it might be useful to our readers to know '''who''' accused the agent of murder. We don't need to take sides in controversies all the time; often it's better to present both sides and let the reader decide, as in the original Wikipedia NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:25, 20 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | :Wow. Pretty inflammatory edit. Almost a textbook definition of what is | + | :Wow. Pretty inflammatory edit. Almost a textbook definition of what is commonly refered to as "commie agitprop." The woman's hands were severed by a local coronor/pathologist and sent to the FBI for fingerprinting and identification, it appears. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:02, 20 March 2010 (EDT) |
Revision as of 19:03, March 20, 2010
Hi, and welcome to our collaborative editing project.
Could you do this edit again, and find a way to keep the accusation? While you were correct to take out the "never brought to justice" part, because that implies that the accusation is true, it might be useful to our readers to know who accused the agent of murder. We don't need to take sides in controversies all the time; often it's better to present both sides and let the reader decide, as in the original Wikipedia NPOV policy. --Ed Poor Talk 12:25, 20 March 2010 (EDT)
- Wow. Pretty inflammatory edit. Almost a textbook definition of what is commonly refered to as "commie agitprop." The woman's hands were severed by a local coronor/pathologist and sent to the FBI for fingerprinting and identification, it appears. Rob Smith 15:02, 20 March 2010 (EDT)