Difference between revisions of "World Health Organization"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(fix)
(Criticism: add date)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
+
Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?</ref> Philip Stevens wrote in December 2005, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."<ref>http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?</ref>
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Revision as of 01:46, July 30, 2010

The emblem of the WHO

The World Health Organization (WHO) is an agency of the United Nations and the directing and coordinating authority for health within the United Nations system. It is responsible for "providing leadership on global health matters, shaping the health research agenda, setting norms and standards, articulating evidence-based policy options, providing technical support to countries and monitoring and assessing health trends."[1] When diplomats met to form the United Nations in 1945, one of the issues they wished to address was the establishment of a global health organization, and WHO came into force on 7 April 1948. The date is now celebrated annually as World Health Day.

The current Director-General of WHO, appointed in November 2006, is Dr. Margaret Chan.

Criticism

Neil Seeman, the director of the Canadian Statistical Assessment Service, said, "Just because a study or pronouncement carries the imprimatur of the WHO should not mean it is sacrosanct," about the WHO.[2] Philip Stevens wrote in December 2005, "[t]he World Health Organization is increasingly working against American values and the interests of the poor, [and] the U.S. should seriously consider cutting back the funds until the WHO adopts a more practical outlook."[3]

External links

References

  1. About WHO World Health Organization Accessed July 16 2007
  2. http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-seeman050103.asp WHO Says What?
  3. http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/stevens200512020821.asp WHO’s in Charge?