88
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 19:23, April 2, 2007
, 19:23, April 2, 2007→Sex and wikipedia
::Like I said above: I don't have anything against that stuff myself (I find most of it enlightening and/or entertaining) - I just find it hilarious that ''you'' point at it with a giant arrow that reads "SEX STUFF HERE". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::Like I said above: I don't have anything against that stuff myself (I find most of it enlightening and/or entertaining) - I just find it hilarious that ''you'' point at it with a giant arrow that reads "SEX STUFF HERE". --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 14:48, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
::: "Aschlafly," I'm not certain what your point in attacking my edits (as well as my motives and my faith) was other than a sort of deflection from the point at hand. I can only assume you're not prepared to discuss the topic of ocnservapedia promoting sexual content reasonably. I wonder, however, if you might benefit more by examining your own actions and edits here rather than questioning my faith. I've made no secret that I don't beleive you can be properly labeled a conservative in any meaningful sense, but rather a radical. I'm fairly certain given your rabid defense of your own views you're not able to understand why I might think that. Be that as it may I've stated my opinion. Feel free to ignore it as is your habit to ignore anything that doesn't fit well into your narrow radical view. Have a pleasant day and good luck with this blog. [[User:Godman|Godman]] 15:23, 2 April 2007 (EDT)