| Line 321: |
Line 321: |
| | | | |
| | :::: I dispute it. Seriously. Please explain how this is a liberal position and stop just stating it as self-evident fact just because you want to bad-mouth liberals. If I said "Conservatives are pro-all-forms-of-murder. Nobody honestly disputes this" You'ld take severe issue and you'd be right to, and I should have to explain myself. Please then, explain yourself. How is "Yay Porn!" a liberal position? Less Regulation is a libertarian/conservative position I thought. Certainly is as far as gun control, how is it different when we move to media? Please provide an answer and stop suggesting that we already know it. You already think we're stupid, pretend we're stupid enough not to know this.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 17:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | :::: I dispute it. Seriously. Please explain how this is a liberal position and stop just stating it as self-evident fact just because you want to bad-mouth liberals. If I said "Conservatives are pro-all-forms-of-murder. Nobody honestly disputes this" You'ld take severe issue and you'd be right to, and I should have to explain myself. Please then, explain yourself. How is "Yay Porn!" a liberal position? Less Regulation is a libertarian/conservative position I thought. Certainly is as far as gun control, how is it different when we move to media? Please provide an answer and stop suggesting that we already know it. You already think we're stupid, pretend we're stupid enough not to know this.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 17:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::: No, I don't think you're stupid and never suggested that. I am surprised that you doubt that conservatives seek to prohibit pornography and liberals want to allow it. Are you serious in not realizing that? |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::: In the U.S., the liberal Warren Court (please don't doubt that the Warren Court was liberal) struck down laws against pornography in dozens of cases. Since then, the liberal Justices consistently rule in favor of pornography, and the conservative Justices tend to rule in favor of laws against pornography. In terms of politicians, liberals support the ACLU (which defends pornography) while conservatives oppose both.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | ::: Maybe you can explain this puzzle. Conservatives freely admit their views and sincerely defend their principles. Why do so many liberals deny they are liberal, deny basic liberal positions, and seek to pretend there is not a liberal bias?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | ::: Maybe you can explain this puzzle. Conservatives freely admit their views and sincerely defend their principles. Why do so many liberals deny they are liberal, deny basic liberal positions, and seek to pretend there is not a liberal bias?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | :::: Another Riddle: Conservatives fundamentally define themselves in terms of what Liberal's arent, demonizing liberals in the process. If Liberal's ceased to exist, would conservatives cease to exist too?.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 17:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | :::: Another Riddle: Conservatives fundamentally define themselves in terms of what Liberal's arent, demonizing liberals in the process. If Liberal's ceased to exist, would conservatives cease to exist too?.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 17:49, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::: That's not true. Here is an explanation of [[conservatives]]. It is based on morality. Demonizing liberals has nothing to do with it. Liberals demonize conservatives far more than vice versa. Compare the behavior of liberals and conservatives here, please.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:30, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | | If there is a bias, there is a "factual" bias, or a bias against bad science, in the mainstream.-'''<font color="#007FFF">Ames</font><font color="#FF0000">G</font>'''<sub>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:AmesG yo!]</sub> 17:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |