21
edits
Changes
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 22:31, March 23, 2011
, 22:31, March 23, 2011→No other animal exhibits religion: Remove?
:::Well, animals do not speak English, so of course we're not going to witness animal prayer. Also, dogs howl over their owners bodies when they witness the passing of their owners, but rather than argue like a [[liberal style|whiny liberal]], I'm going to walk away from this one. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 08:04, 18 February 2010 (EST)
:::Well, animals do not speak English, so of course we're not going to witness animal prayer. Also, dogs howl over their owners bodies when they witness the passing of their owners, but rather than argue like a [[liberal style|whiny liberal]], I'm going to walk away from this one. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] 08:04, 18 February 2010 (EST)
::::The real problem with this point is that it is not, in any way whatsoever, a counterexample to evolution. The fact that humans are the only animals with religion does not contradict any part of evolutionary theory. --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:27, 21 March 2011 (EDT)
::::The real problem with this point is that it is not, in any way whatsoever, a counterexample to evolution. The fact that humans are the only animals with religion does not contradict any part of evolutionary theory. --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:27, 21 March 2011 (EDT)
:::::I assume that I should remove it if there is no objection? --[[User:CecilQ|CecilQ]] 18:31, 23 March 2011 (EDT)
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==
== Some of these are rather incomplete ==