79
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 612:
Line 612: + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)
Revision as of 19:15, August 16, 2011
, 19:15, August 16, 2011→Attempt at Helping the Consnesus Along
::::::The problem, of course, is that no one who wants tenure, a Nobel Prize, or even self-esteem within the liberal university system dares admit that Relativity might not be true. That alone is telling: if Relativity were true, then there would not be the need for it to be propped up by political pressure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:27, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
::::::The problem, of course, is that no one who wants tenure, a Nobel Prize, or even self-esteem within the liberal university system dares admit that Relativity might not be true. That alone is telling: if Relativity were true, then there would not be the need for it to be propped up by political pressure.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:27, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
:::::::"Propped up by political pressure"? Maybe you are talking about string theory...
:::::::Newtonian mechanics is a mathematically complete system that is either true or false ''in toto''. So is the Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism. From your point of view, they're both totally wrong, since there is a huge number of counterexamples (they aren't even compatibile each other), but physicists teach these theories to students everyday. Why don't you attack them in the same way as you attack relativity? --[[User:MM87|<font color="#E56717">'''MM'''</font>]]''[[User_talk:MM87|<font color="#FBB117">'''''87'''''</font>]] 15:14, 16 August 2011 (EDT)