Difference between revisions of "User talk:CraigF"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 15: Line 15:
 
:::::::I looked it up in the dictionary [http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/overpriced] and found out that overpriced means worth less than the price charged.  A track car's worth is it's speed so if a track car is more expensive and slower, it is obviously overpriced.  I don't understand how something as objective as the fact that Ferraris are over priced is considered non neutral, lots of Ferrari fan boys might try to say that this is non neutral, but they don't want to face the facts. [[User:Craig F|Craig F]] 18:45 August 16th 2011
 
:::::::I looked it up in the dictionary [http://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/american/overpriced] and found out that overpriced means worth less than the price charged.  A track car's worth is it's speed so if a track car is more expensive and slower, it is obviously overpriced.  I don't understand how something as objective as the fact that Ferraris are over priced is considered non neutral, lots of Ferrari fan boys might try to say that this is non neutral, but they don't want to face the facts. [[User:Craig F|Craig F]] 18:45 August 16th 2011
 
::::::::Because there is slightly more to a Cars price then if it is a fast race car? Not everybody who uses a Ferrari does so for racing --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::::::::Because there is slightly more to a Cars price then if it is a fast race car? Not everybody who uses a Ferrari does so for racing --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 18:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
:::::::::Ferraris are designed for racing the fact that some posers think driving a foreign car is cool doesn't mean anything. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 18:56, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 22:56, August 16, 2011

Craig,

Please stick to the facts when adding to articles. Opinions on whether a given car is overpriced or not don't belong here; this is a fact-based encyclopedia.

Thanks.

--Benp 18:25, 16 August 2011 (EDT)

How is price not a fact? Ferrari's cost three times as much as some American performance cars and still get beaten on the track regularly? Craig F 18:26 August 16th 2011 (EDT)
Your edits are fine. Quit giving the new guy a hard time BenP - Jcw --Jpatt 18:36, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
Thanks Jpatt! Craig F 18:37 August 16th 2011 (EDT)
Price is a fact. Saying it's overpriced is opinion. --SeanS 18:38, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
Overprice isn't an opinion for sports cars. If a $30k car can beat a $120k car on the track it is obviously way overpriced. Craig F 18:39 August 16th 2011
That doesn't make it overpriced though. The word overpriced is covered in opinion and it's best to just avoid it completely. There is much more neutral ways to bring light to the fact Cheaper American Cars beat it.--SeanS 18:43, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
I looked it up in the dictionary [1] and found out that overpriced means worth less than the price charged. A track car's worth is it's speed so if a track car is more expensive and slower, it is obviously overpriced. I don't understand how something as objective as the fact that Ferraris are over priced is considered non neutral, lots of Ferrari fan boys might try to say that this is non neutral, but they don't want to face the facts. Craig F 18:45 August 16th 2011
Because there is slightly more to a Cars price then if it is a fast race car? Not everybody who uses a Ferrari does so for racing --SeanS 18:53, 16 August 2011 (EDT)
Ferraris are designed for racing the fact that some posers think driving a foreign car is cool doesn't mean anything. --CraigF 18:56, 16 August 2011 (EDT)