Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
98 bytes added ,  23:40, August 17, 2011
→‎biaised...: new section
Line 27: Line 27:  
::The film is not notable enough for its own article in an encyclopedia. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:51, 24 November 2008 (EST)
 
::The film is not notable enough for its own article in an encyclopedia. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:51, 24 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Is it somehow more notable than Expelled? As far as I know, more people watched Religulous than Expelled, and also, Religulous was at the box office, is relevant to religious discussion here. It certainly was a notable film in its own right. Perhaps it was not as notable as, say, Batman, but in its class it was one of the most notable films of the last few years.--[[User:JZim|JZim]] 20:13, 24 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::Is it somehow more notable than Expelled? As far as I know, more people watched Religulous than Expelled, and also, Religulous was at the box office, is relevant to religious discussion here. It certainly was a notable film in its own right. Perhaps it was not as notable as, say, Batman, but in its class it was one of the most notable films of the last few years.--[[User:JZim|JZim]] 20:13, 24 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== biaised... ==
 +
 +
"poorly done attempt"? How exactly is that not biaised, compared to wikipedia?
2

edits

Navigation menu