Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bestiality"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Beastiality to Talk:Bestiality over redirect) |
(I agree with the rv) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No need to be lurid; the quote already provides as much of a definition as we need "[[molest]]ing animals". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:24, 20 January 2010 (EST) | No need to be lurid; the quote already provides as much of a definition as we need "[[molest]]ing animals". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:24, 20 January 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Demography of this perversion== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The deleted reference mentioned that this perversion is "extremely rare". It also briefly mentioned a write-in campaign promoting the idea that "highly educated professionals" engaged in the practice. But: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Unfortunately, although intriguing, it was impossible to establish the veracity of most letters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please read articles before using them as sources. Often, buried in the details, you'll find a fact that disproves the point you were hoping to make with the source. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:43, 24 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:43, September 24, 2011
No need to be lurid; the quote already provides as much of a definition as we need "molesting animals". --Ed Poor Talk 10:24, 20 January 2010 (EST)
Demography of this perversion
The deleted reference mentioned that this perversion is "extremely rare". It also briefly mentioned a write-in campaign promoting the idea that "highly educated professionals" engaged in the practice. But:
- Unfortunately, although intriguing, it was impossible to establish the veracity of most letters.
Please read articles before using them as sources. Often, buried in the details, you'll find a fact that disproves the point you were hoping to make with the source. --Ed Poor Talk 15:43, 24 September 2011 (EDT)
