183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 277:
Line 277: + +
no edit summary
::*Well, I guess you wouldn't, given the number of times Andy and others, including me, said that sentence was "proof" for us. Who are you, any of you, to say your read is more valid? I can see from the insistence of others here, there cannot be any accommodation, because some of you insist only your interpretation is correct. So, I guess the Student Panel will decide. And, until people start to accommodate, and respect religious opinion, they will have to keep on deciding. Doesn't bother me in the least. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::*Well, I guess you wouldn't, given the number of times Andy and others, including me, said that sentence was "proof" for us. Who are you, any of you, to say your read is more valid? I can see from the insistence of others here, there cannot be any accommodation, because some of you insist only your interpretation is correct. So, I guess the Student Panel will decide. And, until people start to accommodate, and respect religious opinion, they will have to keep on deciding. Doesn't bother me in the least. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 01:35, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::: I've explained how I read the quote and why I think it means what I think it means. Neither you nor Andy has done so despite repeated requests. In your reading, why does he talk about molecules? And how am I not respecting your religious opinion? Does your religion tell you that Maxwell was a creationist? -- [[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 01:51, 10 April 2007 (EDT)