Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + +
→obvious and/or undisputed: I disagree
== obvious and/or undisputed ==
== obvious and/or undisputed ==
The very use of this template at [[E=mc²]] shows how bad the idea is{{evident}}.
The very use of this template at [[E=mc²]] shows how bad the idea is{{evident}}.
:I don't agree. The template hasn't changed anything about that page or its content, except that new users will now be swiftly directed to the relevant page that tells them why a reference is not required. It will be particularly useful to those with some knowledge of Wikipedia, who may assume that Conservapedia works in the same way.
:In the future, I anticipate that this template will also act as a good, robust response to those who seek to undermine good material through excessive use of the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> template, as has happened here in the past.
However, if you'd like to suggest better wording than "obvious and/or undisputed" then please do. I think we could probably improve on that.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 04:15, 18 April 2012 (EDT)
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}