Changes

The conversations can be seen in full, though they were closed/collapsed in hab tags to prevent their being easily seen by the biased editors, here. Admin Frank archived them in multiple areas to prevent their being easily viewed.

The conversations can be seen in full, though they were closed/collapsed in hab tags to prevent their being easily seen by the biased editors, here. Admin Frank archived them in multiple areas to prevent their being easily viewed.

* Talk Barack Obama Archives [Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_65 65], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_66 66], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_67 67], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_68 68], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_69 69], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_70 70].

* Talk Barack Obama Archives [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_65 65], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_66 66], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_67 67], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_68 68], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_69 69], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama/Archive_70 70].

I am confident these sources clearly show the level of liberal bias to be seen on Wikipedia, in preventing mention of even a major controversy surrounding Obama like his opposition to medical care for newborn children fully outside the womb -- his opposition to the famously popular Born Alive Infants Protection Act in 2002 that became U.S. Law with public approval upwards of 90% which passed the U.S. Senate unanimously. Despite the considerable news coverage of the subject in both 2004 and 2008, Wikipedia as an institution refused to give so much as a one-sentence mention to the subject, betraying all its hypocritical claims of impartiality and objectivity.

I am confident these sources clearly show the level of liberal bias to be seen on Wikipedia, in preventing mention of even a major controversy surrounding Obama like his opposition to medical care for newborn children fully outside the womb -- his opposition to the famously popular Born Alive Infants Protection Act in 2002 that became U.S. Law with public approval upwards of 90% which passed the U.S. Senate unanimously. Despite the considerable news coverage of the subject in both 2004 and 2008, Wikipedia as an institution refused to give so much as a one-sentence mention to the subject, betraying all its hypocritical claims of impartiality and objectivity.