HelpJazz

HelpJazz 5,000 This user has made over 5,000 edits to Conservapedia This user is a libertarian. • This user's Political Compass coordinates are 5.00,-2.92. This user supports an autonomous collective as the rightful leader of Conservapedia.

HelpJazz is hereby awarded the prestigious & coveted Banhammer barnstar for tireless vigilance against "rational" and irrational vandals & trolls!

About Me

• I am a libertarian, and very much so!
  • Actually, I'm a social and economic conservative. The difference between me and most conservatives is not what I believe, but where I think the government should step in for my beliefs.
  • Feel free to ask me about my positions. I love talking politics with open-minded, rational people
• I (still) support Ron Paul for Republican Presidential nominee
  • I'm currently undecided as to whom I will vote for, but I will never vote for Obama, Nader, any Green Party candidate, or any left-wing candidates (aka Socialist party and those other wingnuts). The only wingnut I might vote for is Bob Barr, but from what little I know about him, he's kind of a "blah" candidate.
• In 2008 I graduated from Bucknell University with a bachelor of science degree in chemical engineering. No job yet though... :(
  • I have a pretty strong background in fluid dynamics, heat and mass transfer, thermodynamics, etc. etc.
  • I was at one point pursuing a minor in political science
    • I have a good working base of political science, political theory and international politics
  • I also have taken courses in economics, logic, and probability

My Editing Philosophy

1. Noncontroversial edits are usually ok
2. I will always follow the Guidelines and Commandments (G&C)
3. I will attempt to make all articles follow the G&C, and encourage other editors to do likewise
4. Essay pages are opinion
5. Mainspace pages are fact
6. No tilting at windmills!
7. I will not treat someone's work differently because of their "status"; this is a community project
8. I will not revert anything added to a talk page, unless a user swears or edits another user's words

My Blocking Philospophy

1. There is no official block policy, so I will use my own judgement for blocking people
2. I will never block someone for being non-conservative (for starters, I would have to block myself)
3. I will never block someone for expressing their opinion, as long as it is civil
4. I will never block someone for violating the 90/10 rule
5. I will never block someone who has had no edits, unless their name is offensive or inflamatory
6. I will never block someone for being a sock unless I am 110% sure (as I have had bad experiences with this in the past, and as I have no checkuser powahs)
7. I will never block someone for referring to or showing up on That Which Shall Not Be Named (and no, I can't tell you what it is, and no, I can not give you any hints)
8. If a block is properly given, then no apology should ever be needed as an unblocking condition
9. I will not unblock myself if blocked by a sysop, or someone I respect
10. I will not undo a block, unless the user was blocked by a vandal

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a new result.

Subs: /chemredlinks, /Contest, /refs, /workspace, /chemeng, /templates, /irg