8
edits
TheAmazingApatheist
Joined December 21, 2012
User:TheAmazingApatheist (view source)
Revision as of 16:54, December 21, 2012
, 16:54, December 21, 2012no edit summary
In fact you can if you say god stands above time and space and so on (which he indeed does if he is almighty), but to be able to prevent god from being tied to future phenomena, you must give him the quality of omnipotence so he can stand above everything.
In fact you can if you say god stands above time and space and so on (which he indeed does if he is almighty), but to be able to prevent god from being tied to future phenomena, you must give him the quality of omnipotence so he can stand above everything.
The ontological evidence against gods
Neccesary in a god is a being that is worth worshipping, so if there is no being worth worshipping there cannot be a god.
Not any of the existing religions can provide such a god. How do we know if there are no undiscovered beings worthy our submission? Well if there is a being that has either failed or not tried to communicate with us that being is not worth worshipping either, so the ontological evidence against god holds, even without complete knowledge of the world.
There is a test, based on the ontological evidence against god, that you can do to try the existence of god. Pray, and ask god to provide you with a clear proof for his existence within a week. After that week, if you have got a proof that god exists, send me the evidence. If not, there are only three reasons I can think of that are plausible:
(1) God does not exist,
(2) God does not want to or
(3) God can't give you this evidence.
Because of the ontological evidence, alternative (2) and (3) are not worth your worship and thus they equal alternative (1). So if you get no response there is no god.
<ref>http://articles.exchristian.net/2002/05/proof-that-there-is-no-god.php</ref>
<ref>http://articles.exchristian.net/2002/05/proof-that-there-is-no-god.php</ref>