| Line 56: |
Line 56: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |13 | | |13 |
| | + | |''[[http://www.politico.com]]'' |
| | + | |left-leaning but a good source of information from a liberal perspective |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |14 |
| | |''[[Fox News]]'' | | |''[[Fox News]]'' |
| | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or subjected to hostile interviews) by Fox News include [[Newt Gingrich]] (after Fox News decided to back Mitt Romney), [[Ron Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] was rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race was far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) | | |high volume of info, but censors many [[conservative]]s<ref>Conservatives censored (or subjected to hostile interviews) by Fox News include [[Newt Gingrich]] (after Fox News decided to back Mitt Romney), [[Ron Paul]], [[Pat Buchanan]], Tom Pauken, Rev. Tom Euteneuer, [[Michael Steele]], [[J.D. Hayworth]], [[Steve Lonegan]] and [[Tom Coburn]]; [[Sharron Angle]] was rarely on Fox News, far less than [[John McCain]] was, even though Angle's race was far more important than McCain's.</ref> and downplays the social issues (for example, see: [[Fox News and homosexuality]]) |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |14 | + | |15 |
| | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' | | |''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'' |
| | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias | | |refreshing in its lack of [[lamestream media]] liberal bias |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |15 | + | |16 |
| | |''[[USA Today]]'' | | |''[[USA Today]]'' |
| − | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports | + | |better than the [[lamestream media]] in its reporting on state-by-state news, and its greater balance; but it has been very [[feminist]] and one-sided in its reporting on [[Title IX]] in college sports; also may be more anti-[[Catholic]] than other liberal sources |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |16 | + | |17 |
| | |''Orange County Register'' | | |''Orange County Register'' |
| | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] | | |the newspaper for the region that once propelled [[Ronald Reagan]] to become the governor of [[California]], and then the [[President]] of the [[United States]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |17 | + | |18 |
| | |''Financial Times'' | | |''Financial Times'' |
| | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] | | |more conservative than the [[Wall Street Journal]] |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |18 | + | |19 |
| | |''Voice of America'' | | |''Voice of America'' |
| | |worth reading from time to time | | |worth reading from time to time |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |19 | + | |20 |
| | |[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views] | | |[http://www.conservativenewsandviews.com Conservative News and Views] |
| | |relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics | | |relatively new, covers a variety of conservative issues but mostly politics |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |20 | + | |21 |
| | |[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut] | | |[http://www.examiner.com/creationism-in-national/terry-hurlbut Terry Hurlbut] |
| | |CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner | | |CP administrator Terry Hurlbut at the Examiner |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |21 | + | |22 |
| | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] | | |[http://www.breitbart.com/ Breitbart] |
| | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]], but no help on social issues | | |breaks some big stories and exposes [[liberal deceit]], but no help on social issues |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |22 | + | |23 |
| | |[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs] | | |[http://www.prolifeblogs.com/ Pro-life blogs] |
| | |a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue | | |a good compendium of blogging on the pro-life issue |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |23 | + | |24 |
| | |[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461] | | |[http://1461days.blogspot.com/ the 1461] |
| | |following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more | | |following the Obama Administrations use and Abuse of the Executive Order and more |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |24 | + | |25 |
| | |Junkscience | | |Junkscience |
| | |exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science | | |exposing the [[global warming]] hoax and other liberal falsehoods masquerading as science |