Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,797
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 789:
Line 789: − − == Almost comical == − − Banned by Karajou (what was his rank in the navy, anyway?) for being TOO open-minded (such that "my brains have fallen out" from it). I thought open-mindedness was a conservative trait that you were trying to foster here? Oh, right, the "right kind" of open-mindedness i.e. are we open-minded enough to accept everything User:Assfly says without question. War is Peace, We've always been at war with East Asia, etc.
Talk:Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness (view source)
Revision as of 04:30, January 11, 2013
, 04:30, January 11, 2013Reverted edits by RichardAllenAgain (talk) to last revision by Karajou
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
*22b. Do you deny the possibility that relativity is ''not'' a correct explanation?
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.
::I believe that future developments will eventually supplant the 20<sup>th</sup> century notion of special and general relativity. But I totally accept it as the correct scientific paradigm for its time, just as Newtonian mechanics was the correct scientific paradigm for its time.