Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] which is also known as [[Neo-Darwinism]] (see: [[Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis]]), but they refuse to accept biblical [[creation]] or [[intelligent design]] theory.
 
Many evolutionary biologists are very dissatisfied with the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] which is also known as [[Neo-Darwinism]] (see: [[Recent clamour to revise the modern evolutionary synthesis]]), but they refuse to accept biblical [[creation]] or [[intelligent design]] theory.
   −
A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities (such as the University of Chicago, University of Oxford, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and other major universities around the world). have formed a "third way" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows:
+
A group such evolutionary biologists from prominent public universities (such as the University of Chicago, University of Oxford, MIT, Princeton, UCLA and other major universities around the world). have formed a "third way of evolution" school of evolutionary thought which they describe as follows:
 
{{cquote|The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations...
 
{{cquote|The [[DNA]] record does not support the assertion that small random mutations are the main source of new and useful variations...
  
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,541

edits