Changes

==Counterexamples==

==Counterexamples==

===Logical examples===

===Logical examples===

# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as brilliant autumn foliage and the staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation.

# Evolution cannot explain artistic beauty, such as brilliant autumn foliage and the staggering array of beautiful marine fish, both of which originated before any human to view them; this lacks any plausible evolutionary explanation. Conservapedia cannot explain that there are people who see beauty differently from others. but da nazi arien rice es buutifuul.

# Evolution predicts that human intelligence should increase over time, when in fact all evidence is that it is decreasing:  declining SAT scores, shortening attention spans, and increasing mental problems.

# Evolution predicts that human intelligence should increase over time, when in fact all evidence is that it is decreasing:  declining SAT scores, shortening attention spans, and increasing mental problems. Signs that Conservapedia, made in the last decade, should not exist.

# The current annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species. Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely.

# The current annual rate of extinction of species far exceeds any plausible rate of generation of species. Maybe it might just be because of global warming. Expanding the amount of time for evolution to occur makes evolution even less likely.

# The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] establishes that everything in the world becomes more disordered over time, in the absence of intelligent intervention; the theory of evolution falsely claims that some systems can become more ordered, like an impossible [[perpetual motion machine]].

# The [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] establishes that everything in the world becomes more disordered over time, in the absence of intelligent intervention; the theory of evolution falsely claims that some systems can become more ordered, like an impossible [[perpetual motion machine]].

# The [[Law of Large Numbers]] states that things tend to revert to their average over time (the large number of examples), while evolution requires the opposite:  that things become more complex and depart further from their average over time and large numbers of examples.

# The [[Law of Large Numbers]] states that things tend to revert to their average over time (the large number of examples), while evolution requires the opposite:  that things become more complex and depart further from their average over time and large numbers of examples.