Changes

no edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:  
----
 
----
   −
On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement | cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire | satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship | silence]] and put in fear opposition voices to their cause. [[Obama]] says the newspaper exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves.  
+
On the 7th of January 2015, [[Muslim]] [[jihadism|jihad]] [[terrorist]]s execute [[law enforcement | cops]] on the sidewalk in [[Paris]]. Then calmly walk into the [[satire | satirical]] [[liberal]] [[atheist]] [[newspaper]] [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s office and do the same. Their goal is to [[censorship | silence]] and put in [[fear]] opposition voices to their [[Anti-Americanism]] and [[Islamofascism]] cause.  
 +
 
 +
The [[Jihadism]] [[apologist]]s within the [[Obama Administration]] suggest that Charles Hebdo exercised bad judgment and brought this upon themselves. "Earnest" [[Obama Administration]] spokesman Josh Earnest said "I’m describing a reason why we have not chosen to use that label because it doesn't seem to accurately describe what had happened."<ref>Hoft, Jim, "[http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/wh-spokesman-josh-earnest-its-unfair-to-call-americas-enemy-radical-islam-video Whitehouse Spokesman Josh Earnest: It’s “Inaccurate” to Blame Charlie Hebdo Attacks on Radical Islam (Video)].  [[Washington D.C.]]: The Gateway Pundit, Publish January 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015</ref> The [[Obama Administration]] refused to call the [[gun free zone]] slaughter as an act of [[terrorism]].<ref>Ibid.</ref> [[Obama]] [[White House]] Spokesman Josh Earnest said it was “inaccurate” to use the phrase “[[Jihadism|radical Islam]].”.<ref>Ibid.</ref>, <ref>Henry, Ed, [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnAM-7L4E2I "White House Denies Paris Attacks 'Radical Islam']. [[Washington D.C.]], [[Fox News]], Published on Jan 13, 2015. Accessed January 17, 2015.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==More Liberal Apologists for Radical Islamic Jidaish==
 +
On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.<ref>Key, Pam, [http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/07/flashback-wh-condemned-judgement-of-deeply-offensive-charlie-hebdo FLASHBACK: WH CONDEMNED JUDGEMENT OF ‘DEEPLY OFFENSIVE’ CHARLIE HEBDO], [[Breitbart]], Published 7 Jan 2015, Accessed January 17, 2015</ref>
    
==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"==
 
==Liberal-created Gun Free Zones are actual "Free Fire Zones"==
−
The bigger issue attacked here is the impunity at which the [[murder|gunmen]] operated in yet another [[liberal]] "[[gun free zone]]" created by [[Hoplophobia|hoplophobic]] [[leftist]] [[gun control]] laws. They promise to do the same elsewhere. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where [[criminal]]s, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals.
+
The bigger issue attacked here is the impunity at which the [[murder|gunmen]] operated in yet another [[liberal]] "[[gun free zone]]" created by [[Hoplophobia|hoplophobic]] [[leftist]] [[gun control]] laws.  
 +
 
 +
These Islamic terrorists promise to do the same elsewhere. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where [[criminal]]s, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals.
    
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones.
 
The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones.
   −
Can you expect [[Islam | Islamic]] [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations. Lets have a [[truth]] discussion on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.
+
Can you expect [[Islam | Islamic]] [[execution]] squads in your town soon? Maybe. They likely will be in-country nationals who respond to Islamic [[Anti-Americanism]] [[propaganda]] to "fight in place." But I think terrorists and criminals in general might find [[American]] cities, especially in the West (such as [[Arizona]], [[Utah]], [[Alaska]], or the [[American Redoubt]] area of [[Idaho]], [[Wyoming]], [[Montana]]) and the South ([[Texas]], [[Arkansas]], [[Oklahoma]], [[Florida]]) , much more hazardous to their [[evil]] operations.  
 +
 
 +
As a nation, we should have a [[truth]] discussion, not [[mainstream media|lamestream medica]] [[liberal media elitist]] "discussion" on how [[gun control]] destroys public [[:Category:Safety|safety]] and creates victims.
      Line 30: Line 39:     
===Firearms and the Second Amendment===
 
===Firearms and the Second Amendment===
 +
* [[Essay:France Pays Dearly - Liberal Gun Control Laws and Gun Free Zones that Welcome Terrorists]]
 
* [[Essay:The Politically Corrected Firearms and Second Amendment Glossary]]
 
* [[Essay:The Politically Corrected Firearms and Second Amendment Glossary]]
 
* [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct]]  
 
* [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct]]  
Line 86: Line 96:  
[[Category : France]]
 
[[Category : France]]
 
[[Category : Terrorism]]
 
[[Category : Terrorism]]
 +
[[Category : Islamic Terrorism]]
 
[[Category : Survivalism]]
 
[[Category : Survivalism]]
 
[[Category : Essay]]
 
[[Category : Essay]]
 
[[Category : Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]]
 
[[Category : Political Essays|Liberal Gun Control Free Fire Zones Welcomes Islamic Terrorists]]
 
[[Category : Essays about Conservatism]]
 
[[Category : Essays about Conservatism]]
SkipCaptcha
12,693

edits