| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| | The bigger issue attacked here is the impunity at which the [[murder|gunmen]] operated in yet another [[liberal]] "[[gun free zone]]" created by [[Hoplophobia|hoplophobic]] [[leftist]] [[gun control]] laws. | | The bigger issue attacked here is the impunity at which the [[murder|gunmen]] operated in yet another [[liberal]] "[[gun free zone]]" created by [[Hoplophobia|hoplophobic]] [[leftist]] [[gun control]] laws. |
| | | | |
| − | These Islamic terrorists promise to do the same elsewhere. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:Politically corrected versus politically correct|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where [[criminal]]s, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals. | + | These Islamic terrorists promise to do the same elsewhere. So-called [[political correctness|politically correct]] "gun free zones" are known to [[Second Amendment]] [[self-defense]] supporting [[conservative]] [[patriot]]s, [[veteran]]s, [[:Category:Survivalists|preppers]] and [[gun enthusiast]]s via the [[Essay:The Politically Corrected Firearms and Second Amendment Glossary|politically corrected]] term "free fire zones". "Free fire zones" are where [[criminal]]s, [[gang]]s, [[War on Drugs|drug dealer]]s, [[mafia]], [[murderer]]s, [[young mass murderer]]s, and [[terrorist]]s are free to fire at will on defenseless [[gun control|disarmed]] conservatives and [[pollyanna|never armed]] liberals. |
| | | | |
| | The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones. | | The concept of a place where "people can be sure no one has a gun" has always been absurd [[left wing]] "[[unicorn]] [[utopia]]" [[wishful thinking]] [[pollyanna]] [[fantasy]] of the [[:Essay:Anti-self-defense movement|Anti-self-defense movement]], for the simple reason that [[criminal]]s by their nature ''never'' follow laws. The [[United States]], [[Europe]] and most recently [[liberal]] [[Paris]] at [[Charlie Hebdo]]'s offices have seen a number of [[mass murder]]s and [[Muslim]] [[jihad]] [[terrorist]] attacks occurring in such zones. |
| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | | | |
| | "The situation during the Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided–in favor of the terrorists–because of current policing and arms policy. [[Breitbart]] News reported that “unarmed Paris police officers” were forced to flee when confronted with the armed attackers. UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived [at the scene of the attack] on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman assigned to the duty of body guard to Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier was killed, and an officer on a mountain bike was gunned down."<ref>Hawkins, Awr, [http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/19/french-police-gun-control-isnt-working-for-us/ FRENCH POLICE: GUN CONTROL ISN’T WORKING FOR US], [[Breitbart]], 19 Jan 2015. Accessed January 21, 2015</ref> | | "The situation during the Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided–in favor of the terrorists–because of current policing and arms policy. [[Breitbart]] News reported that “unarmed Paris police officers” were forced to flee when confronted with the armed attackers. UK’s Independent reported that “three policemen arrived [at the scene of the attack] on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed.” A policeman assigned to the duty of body guard to Charlie Hebdo editor Stephane Charbonnier was killed, and an officer on a mountain bike was gunned down."<ref>Hawkins, Awr, [http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/19/french-police-gun-control-isnt-working-for-us/ FRENCH POLICE: GUN CONTROL ISN’T WORKING FOR US], [[Breitbart]], 19 Jan 2015. Accessed January 21, 2015</ref> |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Constitutional Carry is the Conservative [[Antiterrorism]] Solution to "Free fire zones"== | | ==Constitutional Carry is the Conservative [[Antiterrorism]] Solution to "Free fire zones"== |