Washington Gladden and Walter Rauschenbusch argued the most forcefully and clearly about this.<ref name=McGerr /> Gladden wrote "I do not believe that political society or industrial society or any other society will endure on a purely individualistic basis.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z_JUqFAXzKkC&pg=PA181|last=Gladden|first=Washington|title=The Church and the Nation|publisher=The Homiletic Review, Volume 50|year=1905}}</ref> Rauschenbush was the most clear and concise: "individualism means tyranny."<ref>{{cite book|author=[[Jonah Goldberg]]|title=Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning|publisher=Crown Publishing Group|year=2008|pages=87}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p7g_AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA202|last=Rauschenbusch|first=Walter|title=The Ideals of Social Reformers|publisher=The American Journal of Sociology, Volume 2|year=1897}}</ref> | Washington Gladden and Walter Rauschenbusch argued the most forcefully and clearly about this.<ref name=McGerr /> Gladden wrote "I do not believe that political society or industrial society or any other society will endure on a purely individualistic basis.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z_JUqFAXzKkC&pg=PA181|last=Gladden|first=Washington|title=The Church and the Nation|publisher=The Homiletic Review, Volume 50|year=1905}}</ref> Rauschenbush was the most clear and concise: "individualism means tyranny."<ref>{{cite book|author=[[Jonah Goldberg]]|title=Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning|publisher=Crown Publishing Group|year=2008|pages=87}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=p7g_AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA202|last=Rauschenbusch|first=Walter|title=The Ideals of Social Reformers|publisher=The American Journal of Sociology, Volume 2|year=1897}}</ref> |