Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,850
edits
Changes
Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God? (view source)
Revision as of 18:15, October 28, 2015
, 18:15, October 28, 2015→Some big limitations of the consensus view among scientists
A few points:
A few points:
1. Phlogiston theory reigned in science for 100 years and then was shown to be false.
1. Phlogiston theory reigned in science for 100 years and then was shown to be false. And science is not the only human endeavor which displays self-correction. The Protestant Reformation within Christendom is evidence of this matter.
2. Scientific fraud is rampant today and integrity among scientists is at a low ebb. The consensus view among scientists about a particular matter is vastly inferior to empirical science/scientific method (observational science which has been replicated).
2. Scientific fraud is rampant today and integrity among scientists is at a low ebb. The consensus view among scientists about a particular matter is vastly inferior to empirical science/scientific method (observational science which has been replicated).
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-adjective-modifies-noun.html 60 percent of "important" social science studies could not be replicated]
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-adjective-modifies-noun.html 60 percent of "important" social science studies could not be replicated]
3. Next, watch this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh1cXwhY1sE Defeating atheism through science].
3. Next, watch this video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh1cXwhY1sE Defeating atheism through science].[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:09, 28 October 2015 (EDT)