Changes

The Court observed that "[t]here are no significant procedural safeguards" in [[peer review]] at a hospital. Moreover, there is a lack of "direct oversight by a government agency as well as a right to appeal to that agency."  Instead, "there is very minimal and undefined oversight by the state medical board and no explicit right of appeal to that board."

The Court observed that "[t]here are no significant procedural safeguards" in [[peer review]] at a hospital. Moreover, there is a lack of "direct oversight by a government agency as well as a right to appeal to that agency."  Instead, "there is very minimal and undefined oversight by the state medical board and no explicit right of appeal to that board."

[[category:Circuit Cases]]

[[Category:Circuit Cases]]

[[category:Tenth Circuit]]

[[Category:Tenth Circuit]]

[[category:Judicial Immunity]]

[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]

[[category:peer review]]

[[Category:Peer review]]