Changes

Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)

121 bytes added , 02:44, March 6, 2017

m

Added another counterexsample

Line 8: Line 8:

*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?

*the formula implies existence of a unified theory of mass and light, when no such theory is possible.

+

*The units used as M are not defined. Therefore, you could also say E=613mc^2, and it would still, technically, be true

''For a rebuttal to these arguments, see [[Essay:Rebuttal to Logical Flaws in E=mc²]].''

2

edits