Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
5,230
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Community Portal (view source)
Revision as of 11:49, April 6, 2017
, 11:49, April 6, 2017→Conservapedia's insights
Andy, you write: "The adulteress story is a phony insertion by liberals" Who were these phony time-travelling liberals who inserted the story before the 4th century? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:55, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
Andy, you write: "The adulteress story is a phony insertion by liberals" Who were these phony time-travelling liberals who inserted the story before the 4th century? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 02:55, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
:Yeah, and besides, considering that even the Douay-Rheims bible (the oldest version of the bible known to man) includes the passage, it's unlikely that it was just inserted in, and more likely than not was genuine. Now, I do agree that I don't like it when Liberals abuse that passage, but that doesn't mean we should reject it as a forgery. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 07:49, 6 April 2017 (EDT)
== Please check fake news article ==
== Please check fake news article ==
I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT)
I and JDano have differing opinions of how the article [[Fake News]] should be organized and what information it should include and where. I request that other editors give their opinion. --[[User:1990'sguy|1990'sguy]] ([[User talk:1990'sguy|talk]]) 16:45, 5 April 2017 (EDT)