Changes

no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:     
::It is very obscure, but as Nathan said, we have many obscure articles.  I don't see that this is doing any harm, so i probably would let it be. We at least least put a disambiguation link to McDonald's at the top, but the intro does quickly explain the difference. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:36, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
 
::It is very obscure, but as Nathan said, we have many obscure articles.  I don't see that this is doing any harm, so i probably would let it be. We at least least put a disambiguation link to McDonald's at the top, but the intro does quickly explain the difference. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">David B</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 18:36, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::I'm just not sure what the notability requirements should be because while it is great that CP doesn't face the same limitations as paper encyclopedias (do they even print those anymore?) we don't exactly need articles on some guy's obscure and insignificant basement cult. Also let me know what you think of the revisions I made to the article.  --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 18:46, 18 May 2017 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
696

edits