Changes

::::I stepped in as far as the Kate Upton article because there was a dispute happening and there were nude photographs that she had taken. Plus, she lied about the issue shortly before the cloud website had a data breach which caused her pictures to become public.  

::::I stepped in as far as the Kate Upton article because there was a dispute happening and there were nude photographs that she had taken. Plus, she lied about the issue shortly before the cloud website had a data breach which caused her pictures to become public.  

:::You have to draw the line somewhere. I drew the line at nude. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

::::You have to draw the line somewhere and I drew the line at nude. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])

When I was in high school, I volunteered to help in the school library.  We had a periodical collection, and students would have to request a specific magazine issue, and then the student assistant would go into the back room, pull the issue and have the student sign it out.  The most requested magazines were ''Car and Driver'' followed by the ''National Geographic'' issues which photos of native African women.  We can discuss these subjects with an encyclopedic tone and without including examples.  In contrast, Wikipedia works extensively to collect as many nude photos as possible and is not family friendly.  We don't want Conservapedia to appeal to the crowd that reads ''National Geographic'' for just those few special photos. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 18:05, 14 July 2017 (EDT)

When I was in high school, I volunteered to help in the school library.  We had a periodical collection, and students would have to request a specific magazine issue, and then the student assistant would go into the back room, pull the issue and have the student sign it out.  The most requested magazines were ''Car and Driver'' followed by the ''National Geographic'' issues which photos of native African women.  We can discuss these subjects with an encyclopedic tone and without including examples.  In contrast, Wikipedia works extensively to collect as many nude photos as possible and is not family friendly.  We don't want Conservapedia to appeal to the crowd that reads ''National Geographic'' for just those few special photos. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 18:05, 14 July 2017 (EDT)