Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035
edits
Changes
Bell v. Blue Cross of California (view source)
Revision as of 16:33, July 1, 2018
, 16:33, July 1, 2018no edit summary
''Bell v. Blue Cross of Cal.'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 220, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688, 695 (2005).
''Bell v. Blue Cross of Cal.'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 220, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688, 695 (2005).
Put another way, section 1371.4 of the Knox-Keene Act requires an insurer to reimburse a reasonable sum, not "any amount it chooses, no matter how little," and the reasonableness of that reimbursement can be determined in court. ''Bell v. Blue Cross of California'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 214, 217-18, 222, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688 (2005).
Put another way, section 1371.4 of the Knox-Keene Act requires an insurer to reimburse a reasonable sum, not "any amount it chooses, no matter how little," and the reasonableness of that reimbursement can be determined in court. ''Bell v. Blue Cross of California'', 131 Cal. App. 4th 211, 214, 217-18, 222, 31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688 (2005).
[[Category:Health Care]]
[[Category:Court Cases]]