nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
→Joke article?: Feel free to add.
This article is so ''soooo'' bad it makes me embarassed to be a Christian. Why do the Loch Ness Monster, dragons, and other mythical beasts have to be discussed in this article, while ''genuine'' types of dinosaurs aren't even mentioned? I'd love to be able to send my children to Conservapedia, but articles like this are an absolute train wreck. I really want to cry. [[User:HolierThanThou|HolierThanThou]] 21:10, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
This article is so ''soooo'' bad it makes me embarassed to be a Christian. Why do the Loch Ness Monster, dragons, and other mythical beasts have to be discussed in this article, while ''genuine'' types of dinosaurs aren't even mentioned? I'd love to be able to send my children to Conservapedia, but articles like this are an absolute train wreck. I really want to cry. [[User:HolierThanThou|HolierThanThou]] 21:10, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
:I agree that the article lacks enough information about dinosaurs, particularly the different types of dinosaurs. Feel free to add information about that.
:I don't see why an article about dinosaurs can't mention other creatures at all, but how do you know that dragons were not dinosaurs?
:I have been thinking that maybe some of the stuff in this article could be removed to one or more separate articles (with a brief summary of their points remaining here).
:[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:18, 6 May 2007 (EDT)