188
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Conservative, noticed that you just did this change [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secular_Science&curid=22793&diff=146564&oldid=144738] and claimed it to be unsupported materialism. But one dosen't need to do anything else than just write "secular science" to google and notice that it's very true what the article said. Only times when there is talk specially about "secular science" is when religion is closely linked to the subject, and even then this is usually not done by the scientists themselfs. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 20:41, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Conservative, noticed that you just did this change [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secular_Science&curid=22793&diff=146564&oldid=144738] and claimed it to be unsupported materialism. But one dosen't need to do anything else than just write "secular science" to google and notice that it's very true what the article said. Only times when there is talk specially about "secular science" is when religion is closely linked to the subject, and even then this is usually not done by the scientists themselfs. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 20:41, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Sorry no footnote and 55% of american scientists are theists and if memory serves 50% of american scientists are theistic evolutionists. (see: [[Evolution]] ). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Sorry no footnote and 55% of american scientists are theists and if memory serves 50% of american scientists are theistic evolutionists. (see: [[Evolution]] ). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:45, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
::::While that might be true, one dont still see them referring science as "secular science" and no matter what their personal beliefs are, their research is based on natural phenomens and supernatural is left outside off it. [[User:Timppeli|Timppeli]] 20:53, 6 May 2007 (EDT)