Changes

HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://creation.com → https://creation.com (6), http://townhall.com → https://townhall.com
Line 1: Line 1: −
[[File:Safarti3.jpg|alt=evolutionary theory opponent|thumb|200px|right|The [[Creation science|creation scientist]] [[Jonathan Sarfati]], who was a New Zealand chess master, is able to play [[chess]] against multiple players blindfolded and he remains undefeated in these types of chess matches.<ref>[http://creation.com/an-awesome-mind-creation-magazine-jonathan-sarfati-interview Jonathon Sarfati interview]</ref> ]]
+
[[File:Safarti3.jpg|alt=evolutionary theory opponent|thumb|200px|right|The [[Creation science|creation scientist]] [[Jonathan Sarfati]], who was a New Zealand chess master, is able to play [[chess]] against multiple players blindfolded and he remains undefeated in these types of chess matches.<ref>[https://creation.com/an-awesome-mind-creation-magazine-jonathan-sarfati-interview Jonathon Sarfati interview]</ref> ]]
 
[[Howard Gardner]] at [[Harvard University]] has identified various distinct intelligences:  interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual–spatial, verbal–linguistic, logical–mathematical, musical–rhythmic, bodily–kinesthetic, and naturalistic.<ref>[http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html Multiple Ingelligence]</ref>  See: [[Theory of multiple intelligences]] and [[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences]]
 
[[Howard Gardner]] at [[Harvard University]] has identified various distinct intelligences:  interpersonal, intrapersonal, visual–spatial, verbal–linguistic, logical–mathematical, musical–rhythmic, bodily–kinesthetic, and naturalistic.<ref>[http://www.tecweb.org/styles/gardner.html Multiple Ingelligence]</ref>  See: [[Theory of multiple intelligences]] and [[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences]]
   Line 12: Line 12:  
Given that atheists/evolutionists actively discriminate against creationist and religious conservatives in academia and other places, atheists pointing out a higher prevalence of atheists relative to their numbers belonging to high-profile scientific organizations or being awarded various distinctions is disingenuous (see: [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]] and [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]).<ref>
 
Given that atheists/evolutionists actively discriminate against creationist and religious conservatives in academia and other places, atheists pointing out a higher prevalence of atheists relative to their numbers belonging to high-profile scientific organizations or being awarded various distinctions is disingenuous (see: [[Suppression of alternatives to evolution]] and [[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]).<ref>
 
*[http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=r7q42h4vvqrfp5ob05tnco37r3 Slaughter of the dissidents]
 
*[http://usstore.creation.com/catalog/slaughter-dissidents-p-963.html?osCsid=r7q42h4vvqrfp5ob05tnco37r3 Slaughter of the dissidents]
−
*[http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2013/06/10/suspicions-confirmed-academia-shutting-out-conservative-professors-n1616406/page/full Suspicions confirmed, conservatives being shut out of academia]
+
*[https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2013/06/10/suspicions-confirmed-academia-shutting-out-conservative-professors-n1616406/page/full Suspicions confirmed, conservatives being shut out of academia]
−
*[http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-1-evolution-creation-science-religion-facts-bias Refuting Evolution  Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias, First published in Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1]
+
*[https://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-1-evolution-creation-science-religion-facts-bias Refuting Evolution  Evolution & creation, science & religion, facts & bias, First published in Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1]
−
*[http://creation.com/the-not-so-nobel-decision-raymond-damadian-mri The not-so-Nobel decision]
+
*[https://creation.com/the-not-so-nobel-decision-raymond-damadian-mri The not-so-Nobel decision]
−
*[http://creation.com/dr-damadians-vital-contribution-to-mri-nobel-prize-controversy-returns  Dr Damadian’s vital contribution to MRI: Nobel prize controversy returns]</ref>
+
*[https://creation.com/dr-damadians-vital-contribution-to-mri-nobel-prize-controversy-returns  Dr Damadian’s vital contribution to MRI: Nobel prize controversy returns]</ref>
    
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]]
 
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]]
Line 21: Line 21:  
== Atheism and pseuodoscientific and pagan ideologies ==
 
== Atheism and pseuodoscientific and pagan ideologies ==
   −
In addition, there is a significant segment of atheists who engage in the erroneous ideologies/worldviews of [[scientism]], nature worship and neo-paganism so a certain degree of preoccupation/obsession with [[pseudoscience]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic philosophy]] and scientific endeavors is not surprising within some members of the atheist community.<ref>[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-neopaganism Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism]</ref> See also:  [[Irreligion and superstition]] and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]] and [[Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
+
In addition, there is a significant segment of atheists who engage in the erroneous ideologies/worldviews of [[scientism]], nature worship and neo-paganism so a certain degree of preoccupation/obsession with [[pseudoscience]], [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic philosophy]] and scientific endeavors is not surprising within some members of the atheist community.<ref>[https://creation.com/atheism#atheism-neopaganism Atheism as nature worship or neo-paganism]</ref> See also:  [[Irreligion and superstition]] and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]] and [[Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]
    
== Secular scientific community and their grasp of logic, statistics and history/philosophy of science ==
 
== Secular scientific community and their grasp of logic, statistics and history/philosophy of science ==
Line 31: Line 31:  
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2008/01/atheist-morality-and-iq-in-action.html TIA review aka Atheism in Action]  
 
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2008/01/atheist-morality-and-iq-in-action.html TIA review aka Atheism in Action]  
 
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails]
 
*[http://voxday.blogspot.com/2011/07/its-not-all-nails.html It's not all nails]
−
*[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[http://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]]
+
*[http://voxday.blogspot.ca/2014/02/statistical-misleadings.html Statistical misleadings]</ref> Moreover, due to the poor ethics of many atheist/secular scientists, scientific fraud has become a significant problem within the scientific community.<ref>[https://creation.com/science-fraud-epidemic Why the epidemic of fraud exists in science today] by Jerry Bergman</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]]
 
== Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science ==
 
== Atheism, scientism and the limitations of science ==
  
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,736

edits