Changes

While I wouldn't be so bold as to edit the personal sandbox of certain sysops here, I can't help but point out that the statement: "They use overwhelming archaeological, fossil, and documentary evidence to argue that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times. "  is incredibly biased towards creationism.  Use of the word "overwhelming" when describing the evidence of human-dinosaur co-existence is at best an overstatement, at worst an outright lie.  Perhaps one of the Favored-Ones who hold some pretense of semi-neutrality might consider removing the word overwhelming?  [[User:QNA|QNA]] 11:53, 9 May 2007 (EDT)

While I wouldn't be so bold as to edit the personal sandbox of certain sysops here, I can't help but point out that the statement: "They use overwhelming archaeological, fossil, and documentary evidence to argue that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times. "  is incredibly biased towards creationism.  Use of the word "overwhelming" when describing the evidence of human-dinosaur co-existence is at best an overstatement, at worst an outright lie.  Perhaps one of the Favored-Ones who hold some pretense of semi-neutrality might consider removing the word overwhelming?  [[User:QNA|QNA]] 11:53, 9 May 2007 (EDT)