Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,132
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + + + +
→Removal of transcendental section: new section
If we argue that the proof is invalid, we can't subsequently call this a "theorem" since that term indicates it has been proven. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:01, 7 March 2012 (EST)
If we argue that the proof is invalid, we can't subsequently call this a "theorem" since that term indicates it has been proven. [[User:Gregkochuconn|Gregkochuconn]] 09:01, 7 March 2012 (EST)
== Removal of transcendental section ==
Fermat was a human being known for his integrity and he said he had the solution. Since Fermat was human, the theorum and its solution is not above human intellect so the transcendental section was unneeded. So I removed it.
I will admit that SamHB's edit summary should have been more polite.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:59, 12 July 2019 (EDT)