Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: + + + + + + + +
→Paul Boisvert proof: new section
I will admit that SamHB's edit summary should have been more polite.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:59, 12 July 2019 (EDT)
I will admit that SamHB's edit summary should have been more polite.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:59, 12 July 2019 (EDT)
== Paul Boisvert proof ==
If this is a ''real'' mathematical proof, why does it look like a satire of logic involving mathematics that could be used to prove anything?
And why is there a historical satire involving mathematics too, on the same page?
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 14:31, 12 July 2019 (EDT)