Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Conservapedia
Disclaimers
Conservapedia
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Argument from consciousness
(view source)
Revision as of 00:20, August 14, 2019
10 bytes added
,
00:20, August 14, 2019
no edit summary
Line 16:
Line 16:
* The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness.
* The elements themselves which we consist of, and nature itself, have no consciousness.
* Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do.
* Despite our elements themselves having no consciousness, we do.
−
* Consciousness
can
not
happen by
blind natural forces, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us.
+
* Consciousness
could
not
originate through
blind natural forces, therefore there must be a being who supply that to us.
* Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness.
* Infinite regress of beings is illogical, therefore a single, uncaused causer must be the causer of consciousness.
* This uncaused causer of the conscience is [[God]]
* This uncaused causer of the conscience is [[God]]
Conservative
Irenaeus, Siteadmin,
Check users
, oversight,
Administrators
351,455
edits