Changes

Line 176: Line 176:     
::Yeah, I would consider NCIS debatable as well. I remember another (though not the number) in which someone was made out to be a crazy criminal, who was ranting actual conservative truths (like, the government is trying to confiscate firearms). This was made out to be the reason he was a terrorist. That definitely means it is a  non-conservative show in my book. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 21:51, 22 October 2019 (EDT)
 
::Yeah, I would consider NCIS debatable as well. I remember another (though not the number) in which someone was made out to be a crazy criminal, who was ranting actual conservative truths (like, the government is trying to confiscate firearms). This was made out to be the reason he was a terrorist. That definitely means it is a  non-conservative show in my book. --[[User:DavidB4|<font color="ForestGreen">DavidB4</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])</sup> 21:51, 22 October 2019 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::The Season 1 episode "Split Decision" has a Militia and a rogue ATF agent. It was added to this list because it is generally pro-military and pro-America. It has depicted anti-American terrorists as bad guys. but it is, at the end of the day, written by Hollywood people who live in the Hollywood bubble. For example, many episodes say "the gun was registered to..." when they frequently operate in Virginia, which does not have a registration system. They ask a man "do you have a license?" for his handgun, and you don't need a license in Virginia. Requiring license to own guns is a violation of the 2nd Amendment because it makes gun ownership a privilege granted by the government instead of the guaranteed right that it's supposed to be. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 22:16, 22 October 2019 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
1,464

edits