Changes

I have finally completed the whole article, after carefully reviewing and representing all of the relevant controversial views and sources historical and contemporary both ''pro'' and ''con''. Due to the intense controvery and [[polemic]] attending this topic that I found still evident online during my researches, I humbly ask that the article be locked to prevent both vandalism and any re-editing by subtle deletions and additions intended to slant it more toward or away from any one particular doctrinal view. "Just the facts, Ma'am." (Det. Sgt. Joe Friday–''Dragnet'' TV series). <br>Peace be with you. ''Semper Fi ! '' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 14:39, 18 October 2019 (EDT)

I have finally completed the whole article, after carefully reviewing and representing all of the relevant controversial views and sources historical and contemporary both ''pro'' and ''con''. Due to the intense controvery and [[polemic]] attending this topic that I found still evident online during my researches, I humbly ask that the article be locked to prevent both vandalism and any re-editing by subtle deletions and additions intended to slant it more toward or away from any one particular doctrinal view. "Just the facts, Ma'am." (Det. Sgt. Joe Friday–''Dragnet'' TV series). <br>Peace be with you. ''Semper Fi ! '' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 14:39, 18 October 2019 (EDT)

:Given that I have a lot to do off wiki, I added a small amount of information, yet the information I did add were very important points.  

:Given that I have a lot to do off wiki, I added a small amount of information, yet the information I did add made very important points.  

:After all is said and done, I think you knew the article had its shortcomings in terms of not adequately representing views other than your own. And that is why you wanted the article locked. But Conservapedia has a number of conservative Protestant editors, so you cannot expect Conservapedia articles not to adequately cover the Protestant view. If you do this, you will just cause unnecessary edit warring, etc. [[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 10:46, 4 November 2019 (EST)

:After all is said and done, I think you knew the article had its shortcomings in terms of not adequately representing views other than your own. And that is why you wanted the article locked. But Conservapedia has a number of conservative Protestant editors, so you cannot expect Conservapedia articles not to adequately cover the Protestant view. If you do this, you will just cause unnecessary edit warring, etc. [[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 10:46, 4 November 2019 (EST)