SkipCaptcha
6,434
edits
Changes
→This should be easy to resolve.: new section
::''I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent''
::''I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent''
::And I thank him and praise him every minute of every hour of every day for doing it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:43, 5 November 2019 (EST)
::And I thank him and praise him every minute of every hour of every day for doing it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]</sup> 17:43, 5 November 2019 (EST)
== This should be easy to resolve. ==
An easy way to resolve this matter is to have a pro-infant babtism section and an anti-infant baptism section.
That is essentially what was done in the [[Petrine Primacy]] article.
Why isn't that being done in this article? It seems like such an easy way to resolve this matter.
It seems to me some diplomacy has to be shown by both sides.
I suggest reading these articles on conflict resolution skills and putting them into practice:
https://blog.hubspot.com/service/conflict-resolution-skills
https://www.eaglesflight.com/blog/top-5-skills-needed-to-successfully-resolve-conflicts-in-the-workplace
https://www.helpguide.org/articles/relationships-communication/conflict-resolution-skills.htm
I hope this helps. [[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 17:44, 5 November 2019 (EST)