| | :I would be for a '''merge''', too. However, there is very little to merge because what we see is evolutionists at odds with themselves, or weaseling away from being pinned down on any relevent "facts". The mainspace "homo" should be little more than a wikitionary version of the Greek term, and perhaps something of a disamibiguation page. What is clear, however, is the creation of this page not only was an end run around several other articles, it changes the rules of debate, because it does not hold to same positions articulated elsewhere in the evolutionist viewpoint while at the same time attacking and impugning creationism with alleged "scientific evidence". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:21, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | | :I would be for a '''merge''', too. However, there is very little to merge because what we see is evolutionists at odds with themselves, or weaseling away from being pinned down on any relevent "facts". The mainspace "homo" should be little more than a wikitionary version of the Greek term, and perhaps something of a disamibiguation page. What is clear, however, is the creation of this page not only was an end run around several other articles, it changes the rules of debate, because it does not hold to same positions articulated elsewhere in the evolutionist viewpoint while at the same time attacking and impugning creationism with alleged "scientific evidence". [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:21, 14 May 2007 (EDT) |
| | This is nonsense. It is little more than Conservapedia being used to further the gay agenda. Even the entry at [[Marriage]], which likewise appears written to further the gay agenda, states, | | This is nonsense. It is little more than Conservapedia being used to further the gay agenda. Even the entry at [[Marriage]], which likewise appears written to further the gay agenda, states, |
| | * [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | | * [[User:RobS|RobS]] 11:57, 14 May 2007 (EDT) |