Changes

no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:  
*it would end women's shelters and other women-only facilities, such as women's prisons, by requiring all be coed<ref name="Bob Marshall">https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/leftists-resurrecting-equal-rights-amendment-to-make-us-constitution-pro-abortion</ref>
 
*it would end women's shelters and other women-only facilities, such as women's prisons, by requiring all be coed<ref name="Bob Marshall">https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/leftists-resurrecting-equal-rights-amendment-to-make-us-constitution-pro-abortion</ref>
 
*it would vastly expand the power of the federal government and the courts over every issue relating to gender
 
*it would vastly expand the power of the federal government and the courts over every issue relating to gender
 +
*the proposed amendment never mentions "women" but only "sex," which liberals vaguely define to including transgenderism and "gender identity."<ref>Waggoner, Kristen (December 30, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/475849-reviving-the-era-using-womens-rights-to-undermine-womens-rights Reviving the ERA: Using women's rights to undermine women's rights]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.</ref>
    
The deadline for ratifying ERA expired on June 30, 1982, but like an episode from the ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  Accordingly, it is referred to as "fake legislation" now.  
 
The deadline for ratifying ERA expired on June 30, 1982, but like an episode from the ''[[Twilight Zone]]'' delusional [[liberal]]s think they can ignore the deadline and ratify it today.  Accordingly, it is referred to as "fake legislation" now.  
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, Check users, delete, edit, move, oversight, protect, rollback, Administrators
51,035

edits