Changes

Line 1,506: Line 1,506:     
::I wrote the above when there was a surge of good publicity for the zone on Twitter.  MPR is linking to reports they are running into what looks like legal problems that the zone leaders won't be able to prevent from overshadowing the glowing public relations the left media will try to shower the occupied microstate with. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 00:24, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 
::I wrote the above when there was a surge of good publicity for the zone on Twitter.  MPR is linking to reports they are running into what looks like legal problems that the zone leaders won't be able to prevent from overshadowing the glowing public relations the left media will try to shower the occupied microstate with. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 00:24, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Federal Court upholds basic pro-life legislation==
 +
 +
"A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld a Missouri law that requires abortion clinics give every woman a booklet stating that life “begins at conception.” The unique case involves a female member of “The Satanic Temple” who became pregnant and then sued the state, asserting the law violates her religious beliefs and also violates the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment ...
 +
 +
A state, Stras said in the opinion, “does not establish religion by passing a law that just ‘happens to coincide or harmonize with the tenets of some or all religions.’”
 +
 +
“Some religions, including Catholicism, embrace the view that life begins at conception. Others, like Doe’s Satanism, do not. Any theory of when life begins necessarily aligns with some religious beliefs and not others,” Stras wrote. “So under Doe’s theory, Missouri’s only option would be to avoid legislating in this area altogether ... Stras was nominated by President Trump, as was Steven Grasz, who also joined the opinion. Duane Benton, the third judge to join the opinion, was nominated by President George W. Bush." https://www.christianheadlines.com/contributors/michael-foust/federal-court-upholds-pro-life-law-stating-each-human-being-begins-at-conception.html [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 02:20, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:It's basic science, isn't it? It has nothing to do with religion. Maybe it could be fit into [[War on Science]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 09:18, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
Catholic Tradition like the Didache has condemned abortion since Apostolic times. The pro-life movement in the United States, and around the world, owes a lot to the Catholic Church. Some Anti-Catholics don't like that historical fact, but it is so. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 11:10, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:But then Italy produced Governor Cuomo who denied right-to-life protection to the unborn even up to nine months.  So then there's that.  He's nominally Catholic, isn't he?
 +
 +
:By the way, why is the 1st century ''Didache'' "Catholic" tradition?  It's written in Greek; is it supposed to be rejected by the Greek Orthodox?  Please.
 +
 +
:And when you impute spiritual struggles in others that aren't likely very applicable, doesn't it really rather show your own wishful thinking not unleavened with spite?
 +
 +
:If I were you, I would ponder your answers to these questions, yes or no, carefully—''and whether you should be raising them!'' [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 17:47, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::I can answer the ''Didache'' question. Well, bla bla bla Greek bla bla bla Latin bla bla bla scholars bla bla bla consensus bla bla bla non-scriptural bla bla bla therefore bla bla bla Peter. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 17:54, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
::I know I know. My own brother is the pastor of small church. We were both raised catholic like twins (11 months apart). Since covid, he does Sunday sermons on Facebook. They are difficult to watch for me cause I know him too well, and I'm too critical [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 18:05, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Excuse me.  I'm well-prepared for ''any'' kind of answer N. Xavier chooses to give.  I've had this new group of religious followers assessed and will dispatch them accordingly, as the need arises, either sooner or later. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 18:13, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::(ec) Well, as [https://www.oneplace.com/ministries/thru-the-bible-with-j-vernon-mcgee/listen/2-peter-11921-816312.html Dr. McGee would say "get the word out"].
 +
::::I was gonna say about me and my brother, we're kinda like James and Jesus. Jesus was a party animal (''the Son of Man comes eating and drinking'') and James was a real hardnose (''faith with out works is dead'').  ''The Word of God is living and active''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 18:20, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::::The life you've led is full of surprises, to me at least. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 18:24, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::And that's good of your brother to do those services in his pastorage. He has my respect and appreciation. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 18:29, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
It's not about Latin or Greek. The Didache says, "you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is begotten". https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0714.htm You won't find a similar statement in Scripture alone, which is why some Sola Scriptura advocates were confused in the earlier days over whether or not to oppose abortion totally. The Catholic (and Orthodox) Church has always gone by Scripture+Apostolic Tradition, so there was no question that abortion was completely condemned by God. That is why the Church goes by Scripture+Tradition together. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 23:02, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:*Scripture+Apostolic Tradition, so there was no question that abortion was completely condemned by God."
 +
:* ''my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways'' - Isaiah 55:8
 +
:Yah, but there is a big question about adding anything to God's ways, thoughts, or scripture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 01:30, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::Okay, I am going to put this out here, NX.  St. Augustine appeared to contradict himself numerous times.  Near the end of his life he had his works examined and his opinion asked about them, and he was able to resolve those contradictions to the satisfaction of nearly every observer.  But think of the other Church Fathers that didn't have that opportunity because they tragically died before they were able to do what Augustine did.  Even if we honor their spiritual gains if they were martyred.
 +
 +
::If a single follower has that problem during his or her own lifetime, how much the more would that be the case with many different followers? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 02:01, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
----
 +
Speaking from personal experience as a prodigal child:
 +
*''When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest; and finding none, he saith, I will return unto my house whence I came out. 25 And when he cometh, he findeth it swept and garnished. 26 Then goeth he, and taketh to him seven other spirits more wicked than himself; and they enter in, and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.''
 +
What does this mean? When the unclean spirit comes out, are your going to fill the vacant dwelling with Apostolic tradition? The Holy Spirit does not exist in a vacuum. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 03:08, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:IOWs, you have to have spirit inside you, not tradition. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 03:11, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
== What does Obama want? ==
 +
 +
Black Lives Matter is far from being a revolt of the ghetto. Ann Coulter wonderfully described it as a gayed up version of the Black Panthers. Barack Obama and Eric Holder have carefully nurtured the group since the Ferguson episode in 2014. I guess now we know why. They was preparing the stage for the current revolt. Not coincidentally, BLM's most prominent victims are Hillary Democrats, who are getting purged from the management of the ''New York Times'' and elsewhere. Corporate America is pouring money into the group, which is passing it on to the Biden campaign. See "[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/11/exploited-again-financial-contributions-to-black-lives-matter-are-being-funneled-to-biden-campaign/ Exploited Again – Financial Contributions to Black Lives Matter are Being Funneled to Biden Campaign….]" in ''Conservative Treehouse.'' This leads to the odd conclusion that Obama was already planning this revolt back when he thought Hillary would be elected president. If Ferguson was a trial run, it's obviously not about Biden. Obama himself yearns for a comeback. I don't think anything like this has happened in American politics before. But the Chinese recognize a Cultural Revolution when they see one. This is from ''Global Times'': "[http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1061933.shtml ‘Cultural Revolution’ in US shows divide between fringe and mainstream: expert]" (In today's China, you can condemn the Cultural Revolution, but not Mao Zedong, the man who led it.) The Cultural Revolution, like the BLM/Antifa revolt, featured attacks on religion and statutes. The political logic for it is less well remembered. Mao had been blamed for the famine of the Great Leap Forward and demoted. He was staging a revolt against his more conservative successors, President Liu Shaoqi and Communist party boss Deng Xiaoping. He succeeded in regaining control. Even during Trump's covid-19 heyday, Obama was outpolling him.[https://bipartisanreport.com/2020/04/09/obama-vs-trump-approval-poll-released-donald-is-going-to-hate-it/] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 18:49, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Peter, Coulter also says this is the quadrennial riot groups that show up every election.  You can expect to see Dr. [[David Duke]] again soon, too.  Tell, me, am I wrong?  But see below. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 19:30, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Right now, anyone with an IQ above 85 knows BLM has nothing to do with blacks or police violence; that still leaves, however, a very large diverse voter base among Democrats. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 19:41, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Peter and you are giving me an education.  But how can Obama make a "comeback"?  As Biden's Vice-President?  Michelle doesn't want to run. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 21:31, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::::I think the job Obama wants is leader of the revolution, the guy who stirs up riots and such. If that is what he wants, his first priority is to oust Hillary's people. These are the people who have been running the Democratic party for the last few years. In the primary debates, all the candidates were bashing Obama. He's certainly made a recovery. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:56, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::::Obama's the Paramount Leader. He's more like Deng Xioping than Mao, Xi or Stalin. He doesn't have to be General Secretary ''and'' Commander in Chief, he's above that now and can choose which flunky occupies those positions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 10:07, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::Fortunately, our black brethren are much more politically sophisticated than white racists give them credit for. While Blacks have deep pride and emotion for what Obama represents - a coming of age and acceptance - the split between Obama and many blacks occurred while he was still president. Many see him for what he is, a swamp creature who doesn't care about his people. And they see the Democrats too as racists who judge people by the color of the skin rather than content of the character.  Black business owners and employers who had their businesses burnt down since 2014 all blame Obama, and these business owners are influential in hiring, granting opportunity, educating youth, and as role models. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 10:23, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::::::Mao defined 10 percent of the population as the enemy. This was the basis to abuse people as landlords and kulaks. During the Cultural Revolution, "struggle sessions" and abuse were extended to the whole population, including party members. It reminds me of Joe Biden declaring that [https://www.oann.com/joe-biden-10-to-15-of-americans-not-very-good-people/ 10 to 15 percent of Americans are "not very good people]." Nothing was more damaging to Hillary's campaign than when she declared half of Americans to be deplorable. The polls are pretty unambiguous about this. You'd think that the Dems would drop the Maoism after that episode. Perhaps it's matter of principle. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:55, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::::This situation is hard to keep up with, so thank you for volunteering those insights about what issues are playing large roles in the campaigns. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 00:36, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::::::Peter nailed it. We're seeing Maoist [[rectification]] where we don't see the violence. It began with Roseanna Barr and Jimmy Kimmel having to apologize. Roseanne wasn't a true believer and was ostracized and banished. Jimmy is a believer and is going through reeducation.
 +
 +
::::::Peter has one part of Maoist rectification backwards, however; it began among the true believers before the 1949 seizure of power. Mao, like Gideon in the bible, had too many warriors for the cause. Unlike Gideon, he murdered the excess of stragglers and opportunists to purify the band before the takeover of power. Since 1949 and particularly during the Cultural Revolution, intimidation through rectification was expanded to the general population. The persecution of [[Falun Gong]] is rectification. There are or were more Falun Gong than party members, and it would be difficult to exterminate them all. Hence rectification is decreed by the government ("socialism with Chinese characteristics").
 +
 +
::::::After the Minneapolis police discovered incendiary devices hidden in residential neighborhoods and cast aspersions on the righteous cause of the revolutions, the [[DFL]] City Council [[Politburo]] moved to disband the defenders of [[bourgeois]] [[property rights]].
 +
 +
::::::BLM is a Maoist organization whose donations go directly to the DNC and [[Biden campaign]]; to criticize its very name makes one a racist and hence worthy of death per the Nuremberg precedents. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 06:35, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::Dr. [[Li Wenliang]], hero of the Chinese Resistance to communism, was "rectified" (that's what the documents say) when he was arrested and signed a forced confession admitting to rumourmongering and threatening the social order.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 06:51, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Take a knee for the Lord==
 +
 +
Allow me to ''remind'' you that [[Tim Tebow]] was the first to "take the knee", and all that followed afterward were jealous ''counterfeits'', hardly of principled liberals, but of well-paid atheletes ungrateful of their economic opportunities in America, especially with the new football league, corporate marketing departments trying to be woke and the twitching amputated limb of Chinese Communist influence. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 19:30, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:Wow. Now  that was good. Work it up into a headline and I'll post it on MPR. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 19:43, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Nothing fancy, Just something like, "[[Tim Tebow]] was the first to take a knee in the [[NFL]] and was kicked out," or "[[White privilege]]: [[Tim Tebow]] was the first to take a knee in the [[NFL]] and was kicked out," or some such.
 +
 +
:I know for a fact several prominent media people cull CP pages and MPR for ideas and talking points that they claim as their own and never give us credit.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 19:47, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::Rob, there's some things you just can't summarize.  Sometimes, you either get the full Vargas, or you don't get it at all. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 20:13, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::You didn't gimme a link, and now Cons beat me to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 20:20, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
====Harmonious date====
 +
 +
Change 12-JUNE-2020 to<br>
 +
12-06 x 2020, and you get<br>
 +
12-12120. I don't know what to do with extra "0". [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 20:24, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Trump flips, says would prefer new Republican platform==
 +
 +
(On Twitter.) Like you, I don't want a new one either. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 23:13, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==[[Lisa Page]] and NBC: loved, admired, hired (deserves to be jailed)==
 +
 +
Isn't she adorable? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Friday, 23:19, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:Didn't her reputation get ''Strzok down''? ([[User:Liberaltears/jokes|see here for more jokes]]) --[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]]'''''</sup> 23:22, 12 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::In his heart, he thinks he's funny. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 00:46, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:Follow the plot line closely here now: Strzok's famous "insurance policy" was specifically aimed at Flynn. The FBI opened Crossfire Hurricane on the Carter Page & Papadopoulos non-existent predicates, but Flynn was always the target (he knew too much from his DIA days; he was one of the heads of the 17 intelligence agencies, along with Comey, Clapper, Brennan, their deputies and staff. He knew where the bodies were buried).  McCabe and Strzok wanted to add Flynn to the CH investigation with no evidence to CYA. Lisa Page evidently was queasy about trumping up BS charges on Flynn. Strzok was trying to talk her into it, "it's an insurance policy unless you die before you're 40". In January, before the FBI interviewed Flynn, she says she has the gnawing feeling the whole thing can go wrong.
 +
 +
:Now, awaiting the ruling from the Appeals Court where Flynn can be exonerated any day, Lisa Page is in a position to either cover for her friends and co-conspirators who got her fired, or claim she had nothing to do with it - they were a bunch bad apples, and "I told you so". God help her if she starts trash talking Barr or the judicial system. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 01:09, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:IOWs, "insurance policy" Aug 15; Aug 16 FBI opens Crossfire Razor - Flynn investigation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 01:25, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Two Thirds of Americans oppose Defunding the Police (communist) initiative==
 +
 +
It was Lenin who inaugurated a dissolving the police revolution in Russia before the October Revolution in 1917. Now, Communists are doing the same again. The good news is, 2/3rds of Americans oppose it: "Nearly two-thirds of Americans oppose the “defund the police” movement and some of its major goals, including reallocating funds earmarked for law enforcement to pay for other services that advocates believe would lead to reductions in crime, according to a new ABC News/Ipsos poll.
 +
 +
According to the findings, 64 percent of Americans oppose calls to defund police agencies, compared with 34 percent who support the movement." https://nypost.com/2020/06/12/two-thirds-of-americans-oppose-defund-the-police-movement-poll/
 +
 +
<small>—unsigned post by [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]] ([[User Talk:NishantXavier|Talk]])</small> 00:42, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I studied the polls and suspect this sentiment of "defunding" is loved by hard-core liberals and PhDs in gated communities (though not by all), but it runs shallow among the young and inexperienced who are willing to support it.
 +
 +
:When the young hear the survey question among other suggestions, they answer, "well, okay, we could try it".
 +
 +
:But when I was on a jury once, and the court officers first left the room, the mostly younger people (I was one of them) kind of grinned and cringed and said "so...how...do...we", and then I go, "Is there anyone here who's experienced in running meetings?"  Because I had run a few, and I thought it was a smart question.  So this business guy comes forward, and he doesn't answer me, but he starts running the jury.
 +
 +
:The younger people who were willing to do stuff but didn't know the best way to work together, kind of breathed out and looked relieved.  The point being that while many inexperienced people in the community would be willing to run the police station if they were told they were needed to by the community, they would much rather follow an experienced person than make isolated decisions on their own.  Which means they believe they should stand up for democracy, but they value the opinion of the same people who are able to make practical managed endeavors operate well (most of whom ''don't'' want to defund the police). [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 05:16, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::The focus should be on parents who teach suspicion and inter-generational hatred of cops. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 09:55, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
Defunding the Police is an absolutely crazy idea even by the standards of the Radical Left. If they ever implement it, they'll be the first to regret it. Historically, once law enforcement has broken down, crooks of every kind become the new "authorities" and it's worse than anarchy. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 11:05, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Biden's speech problem==
 +
 +
I learned this a few years back.  It's called "cluttering".  The malady was named as kind of a spin-off of "stuttering", I guess because of the results really are kind of similar. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 23:47, 13 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:Do you think the DNC's ''Weekend at Bernie's'' strategy will work? His latest recruitment and fundraising ads on Youtube make his sound half coherent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 06:14, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Gaslighting example==
 +
 +
"''Everyone'' on Twitter sounds mentally ill right now. I don't mean to sound insulting (seriously), but some of your Tweets have made me wonder about your state too.
 +
 +
"The world is a messed up place right now. Everyone's struggling. I think we need to cut each other some slack right now."
 +
 +
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 02:39, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:We had to destroy civilization in order to save it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 06:06, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::Lol. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 17:51, 18 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Defunding the police, part 145; we may get hold of somebody's hide==
 +
 +
"When a majority of Minneapolis City Council members pledged to 'begin the process of ending' the police department, they underplayed the difficulties ahead,"...
 +
 +
Even if true, more importantly, the paper that reported their "underplaying" under''stated'' the misconduct involved in their unanimous act.
 +
 +
The Minneapolis City Charter ''explicitly requires'' a police force of a certain size, so their actions ''as reported'' (in earlier reports) was a stated intention to perform not just a ridiculous, but an ''unchartered'' act—an act ''violating'' the Minneapolis City Charter.
 +
 +
Who knows what they "actually" did anymore; the scumbag press (prior to this account) either ''falsely reported them'' resolving to commit an unchartered act, ostensibly, from our own experience, to demoralize conservatives, or a renegade city council went further and ''actually did''.  Until this is resolved, ''both parties'', including whichever press outlet originally spread this story to keep the idea seriously in play are on the hook for a documented public ''fraud'' that doesn't deserve the respect, attention and certainly not an opinion poll in response of ''anyone''.
 +
 +
Like the reason why retailers favor certain Chinese goods, there are certain ''individuals'', not a "movement", forcing this story upon us, contrary to the public interest, imposing upon the public not just a scandal costumed as a popular movement, but one not supported by yet-known facts.
 +
 +
And look what transpired.  Black Lives Matters Marxist-virtue-signals it in the form of a demand; The ''public authority wielded by the historical reputation of the City of Minneapolis'' [fraudulently] reflects the signal, or is ''reported'' to have, Antifa-Black Lives Matter Seattle ''receives'' the signal to set in motion the Seattle seizure of the police precinct and no-go zone.
 +
 +
It's not certain I have the events forestated in the paragraph above in the right chronological order—but then again, it's pretty bad that it's even ''possible'' that I do! [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 03:53, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
Bonus stupidity factor: How is the City of Minneapolis going to treat the police officers of the ''county'' it resides in? "We'll block them!" "Uh, er, it depends on the politics of the time."
 +
 +
I'm sure George Floyd's memory is honored by these ''financial engines'' located in ''Seattle'' dedicated to funding ActBlue, benefiting the same political party establishing the police technique complained about by party activists as especially injurious to those subject to police restraint.
 +
 +
And a party whose reputation needs to be rescued by the pre-evaluation of the reputations of four "white" cops prejudged under the onus of gaps in the visual record (subtracted by...whom? ''cui bono''?), further assuring us of the prejudgers own "fairness" in the evaluation of the degree of racist sentiment of the rest of the force they ran for office in a series of elections to direct, a sentiment from which they are all the while further "benefiting" to distance themselves from evidence of their mismanagement of the very same in the recent past as reported by Ann Coulter in her weekly column and as likewise did other writers
 +
(in their own venues). [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 07:15, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:Liberal leftwing communists breaking the law. I'm shocked. Shocked! [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 12:04, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::I put out a feeler and now suspect the old ''Washington Pork'' started the fraud. I'm not afraid to name names though. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 18:52, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::You mean the [[Washington Compost]]? It was NYT and Clinton's press spokesman who began [[Defund the police]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 07:03, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Evolution of marketing a liberal cause==
 +
 +
CBS Minnesota.
 +
‘Rotten To The Root’: Rep. Ilhan Omar Defends Support Of Dismantling Minneapolis Police
 +
 +
There's a lot to unpack here.
 +
 +
This was the first "news triptych window" in a Google search for Minneapolis, with a picture of Omar (who married her brother as some scheme dodging immigration law and was more of a perpetrator than a refugee in Somalia) filling the window, who knows the least about American institutions to begin with, and so is naturally thought most qualified by liberals like CBS to reform them.  Come to think of it, her moral scolding kind of covers up the unanswered questions of her provenance as well!  But I digress.
 +
 +
Here's a prospective timeline.
 +
 +
1. Minneapolis liberals take in too many Somalian refugees (including Omar) using Minneapoleans' big hearts to tolerate the foreigners displaced after, but not necessarily caused by, Bill Clinton's failed cut-and-run intervention in Somalia.  (I don't know if it actually worsened a civil war that was already flaring up, and it temporarily halted, but people blame it as the start of a series of incidents that made the U.S. look like a paper tiger and emboldened the 9/11 perpetrators).  They cause "black" crime.
 +
 +
2. ''Minneapolis liberals spend too much money to ingratiate themselves with the voters and depend on overpolicing of its poor residents to collect revenue, fostering hostility of them against police.''
 +
 +
I put this in italics, because I don't know if it's true, but it could be a good lead.  It happened in Baltimore, so...  similar results...  anyone?  Well, I certainly didn't see it in the next Google news triptych square.
 +
 +
3. Ann Coulter did the story, but to ingratiate the Somalians with the community, they train a Somalian to work on the police force.  Third-world countries don't have a responsible gun culture like the U.S.A., so out on a call of a middle-aged woman reporting a sexually-based crime she thinks she heard from her home, she approaches the squad car, kind of feeling threatened herself; he is startled, abandons the rules of engagement, and discharges his weapon through his partner's window, killing her.
 +
 +
He had no business being out on this call to compensate for the bad publicity the Somalians were getting, but no one would think to call this all-too-likely tragedy a racist killing.  On the other hand since we know what transpired next, we can see it went from being a racially-neutral accident to a potential torpedo of the excess "white" on black killing immediately after the George Floyd shooting to another level of significance after professional rioters (not entirely successfully) hijack the situation into a national incident, threatening the narrative requiring the patching of the ''Washington Post'''s ilk....
 +
 +
[[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Monday, 06:21, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Riot-tracers detect rioters from video camera; CBS news dept. head strangely photographs list of federal charges lodged with date of court appearances, some marked with highlighter pen? and displays them on one of her tweets, then repeats with next batch==
 +
Or maybe it's ''not'' so strange if she wants to stage a circus at their court appearances. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Sunday, 04:36, 14 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Maybe the riots are just a plan to increase funding for coronavirus contact tracers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Live Free or Die]]</sup> 06:10, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
::This is an interesting point nobody is paying attention to. In the face of unprecedented unemployment and businesses that may never come back, Congress has appropriated funds for contact tracers (kinda like the old ACCORN voter registration armies). Now, in the midst of this start up program, Democrat governors are forbidding them from performing the function for which the the jobs were created and they are being paid.  They can't ask if they attended a riot or protest.
 +
 +
::Defund the Contact Tracers! Heck, I'd support defund the police if it resulted in a tax cut, but only if 2nd Amendments rights were guaranteed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 15:58, 21 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Conservapedia proven right - again! ==
 +
 +
Since I don't think this has already been mentioned on the right side of the [[main page]], I think it would be important to note the Supreme Court ruling today regarding the "redefinition" of sex and sexual orientation, specifically [[Neil Gorsuch]] joining the liberal wing in favor of the [[homosexual agenda]].<sup>[https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-votes-6-3-to-redefine-sex-write-transgenderism-into-1964-law]</sup> [[CP]] <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Neil_Gorsuch&diff=1323357&oldid=1306396 mentioned back on March 21, 2017]</span> Gorsuch's liberal ties, and that was proven again today. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]]'''''</sup> 13:36, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Never mind, it seems that Andy made a mention of it while I had been typing the previous message. —[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]<sup>'''''[[User:Liberaltears/mail|May Dataclarifier be well!]]'''''</sup> 13:41, 15 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Supreme Court's 6-3 vote on transgenderism==
 +
 +
"Gorsuch and Roberts’ support for the decision has appalled numerous conservative legal observers, and vindicated voices who argued that Senate Republicans were too quick to confirm Gorsuch’s nomination without further vetting. It also raises grave concerns over the caliber of jurists being groomed and promoted by “conservative” legal institutions such as the Federalist Society ... It remains to be seen whether this ruling will have any bearing on conservative enthusiasm to turn out for Donald Trump’s reelection in November. It is widely speculated, though not confirmed, that Trump’s third Supreme Court nominee would be Judge Amy Coney Barrett, someone believed to be more reliably conservative than Gorsuch or Kavanaugh." https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-votes-6-3-to-redefine-sex-write-transgenderism-into-1964-law
 +
:Gorsuch's argument that discrimination against homosexuals is actually sex discrimination strikes me as a lot of handwaving. But I think everyone has assumed that LGBT was a protected category for a long time now, law or no law. Is anyone surprised to learn that an employer can not legally fire an employee for being gay: "Jeff, you've ''have'' been a great worker for the company. But I just can't have individuals of your proclivities on my team -- not that there's anything wrong with that."
 +
::Hillary gave us "Don't ask, don't tell" in 1993 in the military, and a lot of people were comfortable with that outside the military, too. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 17:48, 18 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
:::I heard a rumor that Mitt Romney fired Richard Grenell because Grenell's a self-declared homosexual, even though it's known to be true that Grenell also calls himself an "imperfect follower of Christ". [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Saturday, 00:18, 20 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Here is the text of Title VII: "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin."[https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/title-vii-civil-rights-act-1964] As it was passed in 1964, it seems unlikely that anyone was thinking that it might apply to gays or trannies at the time. A southern senator proposed adding the word "sex" to the bill in the hope of making trouble for northern liberals who wanted to ban racial discrimination. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 20:51, 16 June 2020 (EDT)
 +
::Does this mean we're gonna get probed, for health insurance purposes? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) Thursday, 01:06, 18 June 2020 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
6,434

edits