Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,132
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Promiscuity as part of LGBTI agenda
The philosophy of so-called "sexual freedom", on which the [[gay agenda|"gay" agenda]] is based, promotes self-gratification over self-restraint, causing both men and women to put their sexual desires ahead of the needs of their spouses and children. The result is an increase in [[adultery]], [[divorce]], abandonment and dysfunctional child-raising practices. Every act of sexual [[sin]] serves the "gay" advocates' interest by lessening the public will to uphold public morality{{#tag:ref|cf. 'Desensitization of public opinion' as [[psychological manipulation|manipulative tactic]] in [[After the Ball|''After the Ball'', the LGBTI “Mein Kampf” of "gay" propagandists]]|group=note}}, since no one wants to feel and be called a [[hypocrite]]. Although they obviously cannot have an "[[unwanted pregnancy]]," "Gay" advocates aggressively defend the [[abortion industry]] because preserving the option to destroy [[unborn child|unborn life]] is essential to maintaining "sexual freedom" alias promiscuity as a social norm and keep shifting the emphasis from family responsibility to self-gratification.<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|pages=7–8 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref>
The philosophy of so-called "sexual freedom", on which the [[gay agenda|"gay" agenda]] is based, promotes self-gratification over self-restraint, causing both men and women to put their sexual desires ahead of the needs of their spouses and children. The result is an increase in [[adultery]], [[divorce]], abandonment and dysfunctional child-raising practices. Every act of sexual [[sin]] serves the "gay" advocates' interest by lessening the public will to uphold public morality{{#tag:ref|cf. 'Desensitization of public opinion' as [[psychological manipulation|manipulative tactic]] in [[After the Ball|''After the Ball'', the LGBTI “Mein Kampf” of "gay" propagandists]]|group=note}}, since no one wants to feel and be called a [[hypocrite]]. Although they obviously cannot have an "[[unwanted pregnancy]]," "Gay" advocates aggressively defend the [[abortion industry]] because preserving the option to destroy [[unborn child|unborn life]] is essential to maintaining "sexual freedom" alias promiscuity as a social norm and keep shifting the emphasis from family responsibility to self-gratification.<ref name="Lively2009">{{cite book |title=Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda |author=[[Scott Lively]] |publisher=Veritas Aeterna Press |place=Springfield, MA |year=2009 |edition=1 (Version 1.1)|pages=7–8 |url=http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/09b/Redeeming_rainbow}}</ref>
Homosexuals themselves, especially male, are not promiscuous because of "internalized [[Gleichschaltung#Homophobia|homophobia]]", or laws banning same-sex "marriage", but because when given the choice, they overwhelmingly choose to be promiscuous. Wrecking the fundamental social building block of [[civilization]], [[family]], is not going to change it. Substitute sex dominating the promiscuous gay culture indicates the absence of love altogether, as one does not relate to the other as a person, but as an object. It is dehumanized and dehumanizing, it treats other human being as a mere appurtenance to one's desires. According to American composer Ned Rorem, the anonymous sex could never be repeated with the same person, "precisely because the next time he would be a person." [[Aristotle]] criticized treating other person as object in his ''Ethics'' where he wrote: ''"Those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves, and not in so far as the other is the person loved."''<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=62–4 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref>
Homosexuals themselves, especially male, are not promiscuous because of "internalized [[Gleichschaltung#Homophobia|homophobia]]", or laws banning same-sex "marriage", but because when given the choice, they overwhelmingly choose to be promiscuous. Wrecking the fundamental social building block of [[civilization]], [[family]], is not going to change it. Substitute sex dominating the promiscuous gay culture indicates the absence of love altogether, as one does not relate to the other as a person, but as an object. It is dehumanized and dehumanizing, it treats other human being as a mere appurtenance to one's desires. According to American composer Ned Rorem, the anonymous sex could never be repeated with the same person, "precisely because the next time he would be a person." [[Aristotle]] criticized treating other person as object in his ''Ethics'' where he wrote: ''"Those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves, and not in so far as the other is the person loved."''<ref name="Reilly2014">{{cite book |title=Making Gay Okay: How Rationalizing Homosexual Behavior is Changing Everything |author=Robert R. Reilly |publisher=Ignatius Press |place=San Francisco |pages=62–4 |isbn=978-1-58617-833-8 |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-JTobNH80}}</ref>
== Atheism, promiscuity and penile cancer ==
''See also:'' [[Atheism and sexual immorality articles]] and [[Atheism and morality]]
[[File:Flag of Denmark.png|left|200px|thumbnail|[[Denmark]] is the third most [[Atheism|atheistic]] country in the world and the website adherents.com reports that 43 - 80% of Danes are [[agnosticism|agnostics]]/atheists/non-believers in God.<ref name="Top 50">[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf "Top 50 countries with highest proportion of atheists/agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)"]. Chris and Terri Chapman. Retrieved on September 10, 2014.</ref>
<br />
<br />
In 2009, Suzanne Ost reported in her book published by Cambridge University Press, that the [[Atheism and child pornography|child pornography]] material produced in [[Denmark]] (and Holland) still constituted the largest part of child pornography that was currently available, having been transferred into digital format and uploaded onto the internet.<ref>Ost, Suzanne (2009). ''Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses'' (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press), p. 29.</ref> See: [[Atheism and child pornography]] ]]
[[HPV|Human papillomavirus]] (HPV) is positively correlated to promiscuity and penile cancer.<ref>[https://www.cancer.org/cancer/penile-cancer/causes-risks-prevention/risk-factors.html Risk Factors for Penile Cancer]</ref>
In 2018, the ''Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention'' indicated in "Promiscuous sexual behaviour can increase the chance of HPV infection and was also associated with increased risk of penile cancer (Madsen et al., 2008; Chaux et al., 2013)."<ref>''[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844624/#:~:text=Promiscuous%20sexual%20behaviour%20can%20increase,et%20al.%2C%202013). Increased Risk of Penile Cancer among Men Working in Agriculture]'', Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018; 19(1): 237–241. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.237</ref>
A Quartz website article indicates:
{{Cquote|Evidence suggests that [https://theconversation.com/religiosity-about-reproduction-more-than-cooperation-18935 religion and sexual behavior are often linked]. Many major religions, such as Christianity, Judaism, Islam and some traditional religions, promote lifestyles emphasizing fidelity and underscoring the importance of caring for one’s family. And a large body of research suggests that such religions may be especially attractive to people who value such commitments—perhaps precisely because those religions help to reinforce their own lifestyle choices...
Still, knowing the perceived connection between faith and sexual commitment, we suspected that people may see atheists, relative to believers, as less likely to endorse values like monogamy and caring for one’s family—values associated with being sexually committed.
In such people’s minds, sexually uncommitted behavior is linked to several other traits and social behavior, such as opportunism and being impulsive—traits that hardly inspire trust
<ref>[https://qz.com/1776715/research-shows-atheists-are-trusted-less-than-religious-people/ Intense prejudice exists against atheists in the US] by By Jaimie Arona Krems & Jordan W. Moon, December 28, 2019, Quartz website</ref>}}
The [[Barna Group]] found that atheists and [[agnostics]] in America were more likely, than [[theist]]s in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: [[Illegal drugs|illegal drug use]]; excessive drinking; sexual relationships [[fornication|outside of marriage]]; [[abortion]]; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; [[Profanity|obscene language]]; gambling; [[pornography]] and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in [[homosexuality]]/[[bisexuality]].<ref>[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard Practical Outcomes Replace Biblical Principles As the Moral Standard], Barna Goup</ref>
== See also ==
== See also ==