Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Talk:Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical? (view source)
Revision as of 17:46, August 25, 2020
, 17:46, August 25, 2020→Debate: Is the Roman Catholic doctrine of grace biblical
::::::::Still riding your Matthew 16:18 hobby horse? You're spinning your wheels. You need to begin defending where catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture to gain any traction. You're just spamming re-cycled junk you already posted in the Magisterium and Authority Forever debates and elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 13:17, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
::::::::Still riding your Matthew 16:18 hobby horse? You're spinning your wheels. You need to begin defending where catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture to gain any traction. You're just spamming re-cycled junk you already posted in the Magisterium and Authority Forever debates and elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Trump 2Q2Q]]</sup> 13:17, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
:::::::::It's the Word of God. The ''Catechism'' cites scripture as the root of Catholic doctrine, so there is no conflict or nullification of scripture in the Catechism. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:24, 25 August 2020 (EDT)<br>Your position is the [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]] against the evidence. You say the catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture. It's not true. Your position is maintained by persistent [[confirmation bias]] in spite of the evidence that what you say is simply not true—frankly a position resting on a [[falsehood]]. It's an example of the [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] which was exhibited by all of the Protestant Reformers. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:34, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
:::::::::It's the Word of God. The ''Catechism'' cites scripture as the root of Catholic doctrine, so there is no conflict or nullification of scripture in the Catechism. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:24, 25 August 2020 (EDT)<br>Your position is the [[Logical fallacy#Proof by assertion|fallacy of assertion]] against the evidence. You say the catechism conflicts and nullifies scripture. It's not true. Your position is maintained by persistent [[confirmation bias]] in spite of the evidence that what you say is simply not true—frankly a position resting on a [[falsehood]]. It's an example of the [[Fallacy of invincible ignorance]] and [[Willful ignorance]] which was exhibited by all of the Protestant Reformers in their debates with Catholic theologians who cited scripture. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 13:34, 25 August 2020 (EDT)
==Refs==
==Refs==