Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:     
:If the goal of Conservapedia is to be a more trustworthy encyclopedia than Wikipedia, as well as to have its articles be as educational as it claims, the articles can't be written like this one.  There are two sentences on what it is, and then several paragraphs on what conservatives have against it.  If Conservapedia is to be either trustworthy or educational, both sides of a controversial argument need to be on the site, or else neither side. -Grapes
 
:If the goal of Conservapedia is to be a more trustworthy encyclopedia than Wikipedia, as well as to have its articles be as educational as it claims, the articles can't be written like this one.  There are two sentences on what it is, and then several paragraphs on what conservatives have against it.  If Conservapedia is to be either trustworthy or educational, both sides of a controversial argument need to be on the site, or else neither side. -Grapes
 +
 +
==Another mess==
 +
The subsection, == links to homosexuality== is either incomplete or does not belong in this article. This article is about activism, not about transgender links to homosexuality, which belongs in the Transgender article. It's presence here only creates confusion, cause readers came to this page to read about activism, not what a transgender is cause that has its own article. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 00:44, August 9, 2021 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,405

edits

Navigation menu