Changes

::::::::::::And second, it goes against historical American tradition to form multilateral alliances, or even bilateral alliances which are permanent in nature. See George Washington's Farewell Address.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 14:55, October 26, 2021 (EDT)

::::::::::::And second, it goes against historical American tradition to form multilateral alliances, or even bilateral alliances which are permanent in nature. See George Washington's Farewell Address.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 14:55, October 26, 2021 (EDT)

:::::::::::::Yeah, and we didn't have multilateral alliances, bi or multi, during the Great Depression, went into full isolation mode to such an extent that we had to withhold any funding to the Germans and others because of it in an attempt to prevent the huge crash from affecting us. Last I checked, going full isolationist if anything resulted in the Communists making significant inroads to America thanks largely to FDR and Eleanor. And don't get me started on all those pro-Democracy groups early into America's founding that Jefferson let in to promote the Jacobins, leading to a LOT of serious problems as a result. And bear in mind that the French Revolution literally helped set up Marxism and possibly also the Deep State. Abbe Barruell certainly thought the Deep State ultimately had its roots in Voltaire based on his Jacobin Memoirs treatsie, and that was definitely while Washington advocated for neutrality (and personally, I think declaring neutrality during that time was a mistake. If we just sided with King Louis XVI and stopped the Jacobin menace, they would have been forgotten as an incompetent group who tried to overthrow France, with there being no Marxism as a result (or at least, Marx certainly won't take inspiration from the Jacobins). We didn't even need to side with Great Britain to stop the Jacobins, just state we're not doing it for Great Britain, but just trying to prevent the concept of "liberty" from being perverted by godless anarchists.). In fact, the fact that the Jacobins literally tried to influence America in a wrong direction in what was undeniably an attack on the American way would have been sufficient reason to go to war WITH France as a third party, as even Washington outright stated the Jacobins were a godless illuminati group and should NOT be supported. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:49, October 26, 2021 (EDT)

:::::::::::::Yeah, and we didn't have multilateral alliances, bi or multi, during the Great Depression, went into full isolation mode to such an extent that we had to withhold any funding to the Germans and others because of it in an attempt to prevent the huge crash from affecting us. Last I checked, going full isolationist if anything resulted in the Communists making significant inroads to America thanks largely to FDR and Eleanor. And don't get me started on all those pro-Democracy groups early into America's founding that Jefferson let in to promote the Jacobins, leading to a LOT of serious problems as a result. And bear in mind that the French Revolution literally helped set up Marxism and possibly also the Deep State. Abbe Barruell certainly thought the Deep State ultimately had its roots in Voltaire based on his Jacobin Memoirs treatsie, and that was definitely while Washington advocated for neutrality (and personally, I think declaring neutrality during that time was a mistake. If we just sided with King Louis XVI and stopped the Jacobin menace, they would have been forgotten as an incompetent group who tried to overthrow France, with there being no Marxism as a result (or at least, Marx certainly won't take inspiration from the Jacobins). We didn't even need to side with Great Britain to stop the Jacobins, just state we're not doing it for Great Britain, but just trying to prevent the concept of "liberty" from being perverted by godless anarchists.). In fact, the fact that the Jacobins literally tried to influence America in a wrong direction in what was undeniably an attack on the American way would have been sufficient reason to go to war WITH France as a third party, as even Washington outright stated the Jacobins were a godless illuminati group and should NOT be supported. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 21:49, October 26, 2021 (EDT)

::::::::::::::Deep States are nothing new; countries like China and Eygpt have had unbroken civil service bureaucracies for thousands of years, despite a zillion changes of regime in the interim. Heck, even the [[Cheka]] was made up of old-timers from the Czarist Okhrana who trained and mentored the younger Marxist revolutionaries in professional police tactics. IOWs, it just changed its name.  There is no destroying a deep state once it takes root. You can only come to terms with it, and maybe try to influence or control it, depending on how much power you have. They have six ways from Sunday to make your life miserabble. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]} 05:01, October 28, 2021 (EDT)

::::::::::::::Deep States are nothing new; countries like China and Eygpt have had unbroken civil service bureaucracies for thousands of years, despite a zillion changes of regime in the interim. Heck, even the [[Cheka]] was made up of old-timers from the Czarist Okhrana who trained and mentored the younger Marxist revolutionaries in professional police tactics. IOWs, it just changed its name.  There is no destroying a deep state once it takes root. You can only come to terms with it, and maybe try to influence or control it, depending on how much power you have. They have six ways from Sunday to make your life miserabble. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]^{[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]} 05:01, October 28, 2021 (EDT)

Putin is not the enemy. The Deep State wants us to believe that he is, because he’s a constant foil for its agenda.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:34, October 25, 2021 (EDT)

Putin is not the enemy. The Deep State wants us to believe that he is, because he’s a constant foil for its agenda.--[[User:Geopolitician|Geopolitician]] ([[User talk:Geopolitician|talk]]) 11:34, October 25, 2021 (EDT)