Changes

→‎Re: Your edits: Carry on but you addition is irrelevant/peripheral to the topic: a biographical article on Judge Jackson.
Line 42: Line 42:     
::Okay, so James is disappointed about Jackson being in an interracial marriage, but it doesn't mean that he doesn't otherwise support her installation to the SCOTUS by the Biden regime.  In any event, the next time you revert that article to the edit you want (contrary to what you're told not to do), you get blocked.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:52, April 15, 2022 (EDT)
 
::Okay, so James is disappointed about Jackson being in an interracial marriage, but it doesn't mean that he doesn't otherwise support her installation to the SCOTUS by the Biden regime.  In any event, the next time you revert that article to the edit you want (contrary to what you're told not to do), you get blocked.  [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:52, April 15, 2022 (EDT)
 +
:::So you own the article? We this unfriendly attitude? We need at least one more person to settle this.
SkipCaptcha
906

edits