Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,405
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 283:
Line 283: + +
→Comments
Not about covid. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 18:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
Not about covid. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 18:04, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Good question. How long has the unholy relationship and corruption of science between Big Pharma, the CDC, and FDA been going on? Is there any evidence that it began with covid? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 18:19, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:Good question. How long has the unholy relationship and corruption of science between Big Pharma, the CDC, and FDA been going on? Is there any evidence that it began with covid? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 18:19, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
:See, here's the problem reactionary leftists don't understand; they think after Trump is removed from office, the pandemic ends, and Russia is defeated that life will return to the la-la land they enjoyed before. It's not. And their No.1 idol - science - is on the chopping block. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Z]]</sup> 18:23, April 23, 2022 (EDT)
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
== Non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines ==
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)
While I can understand that some are fearful of all vaccines, and others of just suspicious of [[mRNA]] COVID-19 Vaccines, I do not understand why '''non-mRNAm, traditional viral vector covid vaccines''' are not covered here. It would seem that Conservapedia recognizes the value of non-controversial vaccines in saving lives. --[[User:Jackin the box|Jackin the box]] ([[User talk:Jackin the box|talk]]) 15:37, April 12, 2022 (EDT)