Changes

no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:  
*the [[Gospel of Mark]] omits subsequent events after the Resurrection;
 
*the [[Gospel of Mark]] omits subsequent events after the Resurrection;
 
*the Gospel of Mark contains remarkable detail that would fade if written long afterwards;
 
*the Gospel of Mark contains remarkable detail that would fade if written long afterwards;
−
*the Gospel of Mark is concise and to-the-point, while a later work would be less terse; and
+
*the Gospel of Mark is concise and to-the-point, while a later work would be less terse;
 +
*the [[Gospel of Matthew]] and the [[Gospel of Luke]], both written within decades of [[Jesus]]'s ministry, copied extensively and independently from the Gospel of Mark which must therefore had been available far earlier; and
 
*the Gospel of Mark is by an [[Mark the eyewitness|eyewitness]], many of who were killed or scattered by years later.
 
*the Gospel of Mark is by an [[Mark the eyewitness|eyewitness]], many of who were killed or scattered by years later.
 
{{Mark}}
 
{{Mark}}
 
[[category:Bible]]
 
[[category:Bible]]
 
[[category:Gospels]]
 
[[category:Gospels]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits