Changes

Line 90: Line 90:  
:Thank you for responding.  I did look at the article, the discussion, and the sources, but nothing pointed to a known usage of "New Ordeal".  This make me think perhaps it was a creative, clever coinage of yours or of someone you know. It did go thru the citations in great detail. Perhaps this could be explained?  [[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 00:07, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:Thank you for responding.  I did look at the article, the discussion, and the sources, but nothing pointed to a known usage of "New Ordeal".  This make me think perhaps it was a creative, clever coinage of yours or of someone you know. It did go thru the citations in great detail. Perhaps this could be explained?  [[User:PaulP|PaulP]] 00:07, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::Frankly you have me confused; are you sure you have the right discussion page?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:54, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::Frankly you have me confused; are you sure you have the right discussion page?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:54, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::How about changing this from a mainspace page to something like Essay: The New Ordeal, because it appears to be just that.  It is an essay by RobS about a period to which he has given a cutesy name, either of his own creation, or an obscure reference earlier in life.  It reminds me of going to college and using words that had become common in our home, but were euphamisms created by my mother or father. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 07:37, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
252

edits