Changes

3,202 bytes removed ,  12:41, September 12, 2023
m
Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by RobSmith
Line 29: Line 29:     
:::Does it make sense now? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 
:::Does it make sense now? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:18, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
−
::::<big>'''Please note:'''</big> I did make edits to the talk page.
  −
  −
::::'''<big>An admission and accepting of some fault''':</big> And we did improve the articles via our talk page edits. I elaborated more on what "drama" is. I could have been more prompt in relation to this I admit. But I thought the term "drama" in relation to psychology and/or bad/toxic behavior is widely known and needed no explanation. But it turns out that adding the extra verbiage/quote did further clarify. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:16, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
  −
  −
== Psychology articles ==
  −
  −
I sent Andy, another Conservapedian and you an email which is a copy of my recent post to Andy's talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:34, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
  −
  −
== Re: Your recent edits to the psychology articles ==
  −
  −
The last time I pushed hard for you to be disciplined, I was successful. I prefer not to push hard again and for you to behave more reasonably and cordially.
  −
  −
I did push very hard for you to not be banned when Karajou was pushing very hard for it. It made a difference and you were not banned.
  −
  −
All I ask is that you source your material and behave cordially. That is not too much to ask for in relation to the psychology articles and other articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:10, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
  −
  −
== My psychology article editing: My interest in psychology,  the psychology articles and abnormal psychology/pathology ==
  −
  −
One of the reasons I created articles and expanded articles as far as the Conservapedia psychology articles is due to my professional life.
  −
  −
I work as a Producer/booker for a leading podcast (top 1/2 percent of all podcasts in listenership). And one of the areas we cover is the true crime genre. I find criminology and psychological pathology interesting. And I enjoy listening to the podcasts of the people I book in the true crime area - especially the authors who went into the cells of prisoners to interview them or did detailed analyses of these criminals.
  −
  −
In addition, I work in some fields where one has to very much understand human behavior in order to be successful.
  −
  −
So I lot of my editing in these areas was related to my personal interest and study/knowledge of these areas. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:32, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
  −
  −
== Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting ==
  −
  −
Your material related to the Third Reich and Donbas was interesting. I know you have an interest in Russia.
  −
  −
I covered the material on abnormal psychology that I thought was interesting. So I don't expect to create any more content in this area. Any new content related to psychology will be related to cognitive psychology (learning) or psychology related to motivation, self-control, conscientiousness. In other words, psychology related to human performance.
  −
  −
My friend told me that your past material on communism and the Soviet Union was informative material. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:29, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,076

edits